Re: [TLS] rfc7366: is encrypt-then-mac implemented?

Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg@polarssl.org> Thu, 06 November 2014 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mpg@polarssl.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FC91A19F7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:16:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQ_0EHRfrZ9U for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:16:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vps2.offspark.com (vps2.brainspark.nl [141.138.204.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6A921A0A6A for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:16:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=polarssl.org; s=exim; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=H1r19uTIpg8TJIz2CHAR8kFBxZ2Cj4XKfXE4xX10kUc=; b=LoZPr01Z6/z45sLRIIIkTmtNKJddgfy13DwCcF7Tph4GiVBEPC1OlfHYc617bDGMsj6UoVMhmmyNZ64ZirnN+bgXAkl9NdA+lZzCksKgsHNChs5bi072hKClhlIrNoKBxjUcVoArWUxZK86yvjvuZsCZ/tS0P8RwPMd1YaS/Ry0=;
Received: from mna75-11-88-161-199-191.fbx.proxad.net ([88.161.199.191] helo=[192.168.0.12]) by vps2.offspark.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mpg@polarssl.org>) id 1XmAkB-0004Z0-9W; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:16:07 +0100
Message-ID: <545ABDCB.2050305@polarssl.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 01:16:11 +0100
From: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg@polarssl.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mrex@sap.com, "Yngve N. Pettersen" <yngve@spec-work.net>
References: <20141105235823.943381AF95@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <20141105235823.943381AF95@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 88.161.199.191
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mpg@polarssl.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vps2.offspark.com)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Vk7CosURqtjnQ4RTkHbzNwEibQM
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] rfc7366: is encrypt-then-mac implemented?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 00:16:16 -0000

On 06/11/2014 00:58, Martin Rex wrote:
> I agree with many parts of your root cause analysis why the content
> of rfc7366 is a failure (beyond fixing through the errata process).
> 
Really? Could you please elaborate on why you think the proposed fixes in [1]
(undoubling the doubled paragraph) and [2] are not correct fixes suitable for an
erratum?

[1] http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/3NOHlIUShLo9AAzXx4t2u7QV8Sw
[2] http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/zYBKe9L9n3tNZ_SBWn77ubLzNPs

Manuel.