[TLS] Re: What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline signature split
Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Wed, 08 April 2026 05:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BB8D7E4DFA for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1775627414; bh=LctVfY12zAlWohJmV0zlwrIueC3X/lUnbUEJnBU/s3Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:References:In-Reply-To; b=pKSV024rrE5chRRMhgW4DtjwDbBGAkthLGT/LwTIKH0sOOOmigMF6sEWH7oYDiJFr 1OT9Cq4zAzR2NuE3l+AQklWk3VK37mAfJujY2tAg88Z3H4Ik71X07UekSwwxk8fwBH U8mJ423YXXxRDVNgNvutyeYDnx6rUcHPCdfAwbb0=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dukhovni.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QNijsyuuiaw for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chardros.imrryr.org (chardros.imrryr.org [144.6.86.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CEE1D7E4DBA for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 22:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dukhovni.org; i=@dukhovni.org; q=dns/txt; s=f8320d6e; t=1775627399; h=date : from : to : subject : message-id : reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=LctVfY12zAlWohJmV0zlwrIueC3X/lUnbUEJnBU/s3Q=; b=SzbGHhOBKTz6gg9jd+TdzqzIOYwqi2F40JALxA2TE4QP2bCBh0AiXmXUz3lBwLHWVxLkr bCr2GwWWQEBBdmAzUa/NVw5qT8N/hKCSeqYuum1vdEdrVgn7VZ2h2clGp5kl4FcieJBDnm4 pS3w7RdLHydpugqwBF2qwbyiT5mC7Ps=
Received: by chardros.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5133C937704; Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:49:59 +1000 (AEST)
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:49:59 +1000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <adXshwwTovNLiuoy@chardros.imrryr.org>
References: <MgNiohcykfGTjVuD5YkbKNofLPqoyyHJ31KztG3nKi06534S8J_yg4FIkYjlyRiGoCHMMn5UohbTMnjSULxnKRDCDaZEwelhtW0jAwRjy-U=@marionberry.net> <CAPxHsS+EDEYA-Sx5i-j_eFsePmNj3tPc3Nrjgqj_W75Chq+yUQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPxHsS+EDEYA-Sx5i-j_eFsePmNj3tPc3Nrjgqj_W75Chq+yUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: X2TBWNNGMP42IP7HLULGU54CQ2ATKNBM
X-Message-ID-Hash: X2TBWNNGMP42IP7HLULGU54CQ2ATKNBM
X-MailFrom: ietf-dane@dukhovni.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Re: What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline signature split
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Vq5X-8QJxJ6Smqb1amel5g4Nd8Q>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>
On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 07:32:27PM -0400, Daniel Apon wrote:
> KEMTLS is fantastic,
It certainly looks very interesting, and worthy of further exploration.
--
Viktor. 🇺🇦 Слава Україні!
- [TLS] What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline signat… Joshua
- [TLS] Re: What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline si… Daniel Apon
- [TLS] Re: What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline si… Loganaden Velvindron
- [TLS] Re: [EXT] What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offl… Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- [TLS] Re: What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline si… Viktor Dukhovni
- [TLS] Re: What about AuthKEM? / Online-Offline si… Thom Wiggers