[TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6140)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 29 April 2020 08:18 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71E43A058F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhiV1Tll8vgL for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA643A053E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B9382F40756; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
To: ekr@rtfm.com, rdd@cert.org, kaduk@mit.edu, caw@heapingbits.net, joe@salowey.net, sean+ietf@sn3rd.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: research@bensmyth.com, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200429081837.B9382F40756@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 01:18:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VsSqxMYrDa8WrzuiuYOmXXGZ4P8>
Subject: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6140)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:18:55 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8446, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6140 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Ben Smyth <research@bensmyth.com> Section: 4.4.2.2. Original Text ------------- This fallback chain SHOULD NOT use the deprecated SHA-1 hash algorithm in general, but MAY do so if the client's advertisement permits it, and MUST NOT do so otherwise. Corrected Text -------------- This fullback chain MUST NOT use the deprecated SHA-1 hash, except if advertised by the client, in which case it MAY. Notes ----- The original text is difficult to read, eliminating the unnecessary "SHOULD NOT" seems to make it easier. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8446 (draft-ietf-tls-tls13-28) -------------------------------------- Title : The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 Publication Date : August 2018 Author(s) : E. Rescorla Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6140) RFC Errata System