Re: [TLS] Call for consensus: Removing DHE-based 0-RTT

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sat, 02 April 2016 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87B912D770 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 03:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IydScZut9Doe for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 03:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B1912D76D for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 03:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id cl4so16773362igb.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 03:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=1BwobqSRO9OZxgEKiq5qO1T6snun/o3LYWQpQpU3BSo=; b=ezUNBxu4umskGpfP7Xp1Ko28GS2z0rY4kGjw+Xnb5YrpQmcb5jMLK/wHMs1OzDiHuc NosqBWsGd7QcRGFlF1NGEl5cYj9MKE4m2nOgbrqCPYTMQrGtsCxh5Wi0g3EiMkur5dos SWJ2cxknZYrX1Ggtavc1mo6d2Dmsyhm7gTxmmfjp7i2Kxo6YXC4Yu9t3ueoUuBIiCdrd 5hB8iDIDYv1UGGJZWnORW+933N3HC14V1W2wNmTZ6eToZfclii7DrIKflUOVoswrYVpR BhJemUltLlv/sqzX6H+HJH2AqJOgHsM2UNTugG7JNCZHDySDRw1P5AMn++u6PpXpOqDs sFKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=1BwobqSRO9OZxgEKiq5qO1T6snun/o3LYWQpQpU3BSo=; b=ED2If9xFfyueCHNXihphLm0TmLlDrnsq6SYtdwBdPI5B5TizZ27qNqHtApZBLGXcw1 gucW6IN+VZ7ilipzSu05arPo8CPn1kQ+zFX4jWxiVYE63+BurMyJ6sqchPFx7EFSLW8Q Mss07D4lbn61J3RY8BW9oycUAIeJm71BqS2g9dX/HPLVLFMoFlUV33qW4/ZTCUI+fAij 9FuC3enFvjNyo8fukbqpErb8vD6r2zLvglkof1/B14V87RbEnbB7QUdsKPIacnCepZJ+ yVou3BlDi/PCC2kXqJd7piR44xxmPgTLYVP6HZkkGam/UIm5pgkfW0Gb2WQ+IApOBSqU U0vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLVNslql+9nTIQVwkNxaZBoh7Gs7dlPKSm0cfCfORznlQ+/IsJGWShmaPGtMjEeClxDrrtvgYKIw+Q4Ow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.137.100 with SMTP id l97mr9247520iod.100.1459593853561; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2016 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALTJjxF99rRVZY28tPwc8L1RSks+3pD4pg6bng=PyR_VrW_d2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <063B3B0B-B141-459C-890F-9E001655936F@sn3rd.com> <CALTJjxHDwTgVoCbHpLdAJft1U0h0i0Lt4BknSOJUn6O5yoVj-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNJQbSBUA2LSGJDToM9boRyVy_n+=QrngF1nnTe9Fzh1g@mail.gmail.com> <CALTJjxFftq6_eM2PERS=eC=j20EmG1_hBVLq994vtTq+SWjsSw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX__CSHcpV4Va4OQS6Nz2ZT-uCn6DFoYDeEwfc-_tbLPg@mail.gmail.com> <CALTJjxF99rRVZY28tPwc8L1RSks+3pD4pg6bng=PyR_VrW_d2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 21:44:13 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnU5SEDpw8zyKEr0+qyxbA6F8iO9=uE==WWKMKS76TY80g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VuW6fwwaF6SFx21yDCLXaRXSXYo>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for consensus: Removing DHE-based 0-RTT
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 10:44:16 -0000

On 31 March 2016 at 15:52, Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com> wrote:
> The info is these two tables is exactly the same for DHE-based 0-RTT
> and PSK-based 0-RTT.


You are right.  I remain concerned about the other factors.