Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] [saag] Question regarding CFRG process

Basil Dolmatov <dol@cryptocom.ru> Sun, 15 December 2013 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <dol@cryptocom.ru>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5591AE1D5; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 00:36:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.448
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cx7jWDVpVovo; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 00:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.reedcat.net (mail.reedcat.net [85.17.92.214]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BF91AE1D7; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 00:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.63.8] (broadband-188-255-54-202.nationalcablenetworks.ru [188.255.54.202]) by mail.reedcat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00E7D1A4927; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:35:50 +0400 (MSK)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
From: Basil Dolmatov <dol@cryptocom.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <8cf8a51b9dcfd0c40b80ae2aad2cff7c.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:35:49 +0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A8314181-93F6-41F2-B503-96BE790836DD@cryptocom.ru>
References: <CAGZ8ZG0qnon4CYUh+2t201aioU1sHVQT9_8CMoez_5yM=N-cCA@mail.gmail.com> <18138981706be6221b2d05187da48394.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0ckiDG8bt+zMG=R3JErb4SD0mey+ou5tGZ30x2tjy9v7mA@mail.gmail.com> <bad4a1b3e1f5f799418ef3c6fab9492c.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0ckBcxP=mOdxS-fZQL5upkPqsHHuQVZvD-G-tYSnmySVmg@mail.gmail.com> <8cf8a51b9dcfd0c40b80ae2aad2cff7c.squirrel@www.trepanning.net>
To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:07:15 -0800
Cc: cfrg@ietf.org, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, saag@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Cfrg] [saag] Question regarding CFRG process
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 08:36:03 -0000

Was impressed by the quality of arguments used in discussing of new cryptographic protocols. :-/

dol@


13 дек. 2013 г., в 12:35, Dan Harkins <dharkins@lounge.org>; написал(а):

> 
> 
>  You obviously read too much fiction and have too little practical
> experience. Dragonfly is not a threat to human life. Get a grip.
> 
...
>  I'm also familiar with well-respected cryptographers who participated
> in the IPsec WG in the 90s. You are nobody compared to them and your
> ignorant reference confirms that.
> 
>>>>> 
> 
>  Dan.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Cfrg mailing list
> Cfrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>