[TLS] Confirming consensus for ALPN

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 15 March 2013 21:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AC321F8507 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sm606tc1A8II for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22b.google.com (mail-qc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7207221F8493 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id d1so344468qca.16 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:x-originating-ip:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Acdq69qGaqqOe6msAGCVg3ViO3/EMexezY8kkZ76LJQ=; b=IetOHuM34WagFWyZ6O8zA6ODoMaam3LkaheYb/hw/+NECCuWO/V7IE/DaJPflaG5FT 6jRiPXzIyxtskshwkRuCvw6wcYPHhCzj+R9s4QNWeu+/lEHMR/wNKSvbofBna4ohE0RC Eamty9NTHamnxYM9Rccr2iJVEtjt5gC8kCqbEZpNmEf+K9ljGuKQuXkvww/s337P1XVV N8ezs9+1Zz7l698i1e3Calys4GU5IUjrehpyh9pPF+XA7oDQx8qUAeFzT3jgoAQaopFF ewec6lxfuBOZIAB7HOq8B4Er7UPpC0g4NPQnltQe6SKMd3zlP8XKGHnNJ4vjfnwEZ/wm 9SaA==
X-Received: by 10.49.28.229 with SMTP id e5mr8766362qeh.14.1363383980677; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.84.5 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:df8:0:16:5a55:caff:fef1:5a11]
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:45:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOFkcW6XvFqWivn4+WSac727iNVQYBumRBmagwBRv1UXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bdc0aa6dcb7c704d7fd9177"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk7l7oiyjbh8OHg0UxN+fC/pWgXwPf+R8NPfevzYZuB5JOlElR/OwNnIBXtL9zGbg0/HnqR
Subject: [TLS] Confirming consensus for ALPN
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:46:22 -0000

At today's TLS WG f2f meeting we had rough consensus to adopt
ALPN as the solution to the upper-layer protocol negotiation problem
posed to us by the HTTP WG.

if you have an opinion on this topic and were not at the meeting,
please send a message to the mailing list and/or the chairs by
Friday March 29.

-Ekr
[For the chairs]