Re: [TLS] Certificate compression draft

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26301129ABA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gfp6sY393_f for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:33:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503FE12956B for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:33:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v125so125477937qkh.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:33:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=R7Q34I7OqqcqB8JaF8R4xgILwrJrY52Jzl8QWK63ZHQ=; b=E4sLjAYaR5IlYX2MJJpVa6OO5WLLH98QItuG4kWAAPdDO8Ql1s0WMuaAibIorGv5Fg 56zM3kCgG0J6oInN6YStKOd+QlonTaTuZhDr7xtgowxsocDiIJow+4iYpksCxPX+FeO2 q2DSMaQrrkmfhbVpF+gJH9dis4Vcw/5MwWgalUI+zOx33Av9T+0fJB0zvJOkRX0q5SY1 RiXgXXquZyEWSWqixvszT3sJv8MmRENOsvDfvrjWu3rouet1YgWAlpVixKvGexyAyqmF tMHuoffbg8SvXOBJ8YkE8FWB2BQ3zHjFz9T/BksrVA0aRUuOyluQ+nPtx6H0gbX3NsYq kisA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=R7Q34I7OqqcqB8JaF8R4xgILwrJrY52Jzl8QWK63ZHQ=; b=Syik1KSFnGTYJiVm8OP6shcEQG8DjmpDZPTNieJmf34e3NRIW5Qbi4tJxOhU2fbQKC QQ8AMDOKjXycGNpvUmo1Ypxv4md4pCegtC1p9McrOUSWNhCDMNiYP9LQoWhslgaOYYHv 9BjZ97fs6LmslJR5OYqI4jmWoYmJDW/INpjKw1c+G3IcELUYlA713kZAD0wAfKww0m5b B0RkRrKCFazRg31FT+IN1UgRl2TJqr4QCn3h+GAcuiO56ofbeArh5YuRX3j9pYN70OdP Q2QQzoCzUzmmtyXkQH+fe4f613fOWRzZFGtF8iq6cV71aptE0NCe/IvjkS+3fYVvNytR FDRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mTRjR2VNeVycKbew99NMs1DXrQN5XcAI2XTAXYahf66V4LmCl3sK8DadJ1Aqk/OrCt11lmj/h8k2MrxA==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.208 with SMTP id i16mr19264975qta.13.1488857587447; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:33:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.19.112 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:33:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E0B8B6EF-48D5-4A78-A8A8-83D44F04D3A2@dukhovni.org>
References: <CAAZdMacAcSUL4sqLPA1E9-z_VaUSd1P5PpPryO+XQso0eUtThw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnU54SeYDBL=YBRQn0ZThk=C59Rztvr2zkUCLSSv2cKTDg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAZdMaf9n_37soxdJ9ACFFke=iXyux82QEVnr5XgmS2bs2FTYA@mail.gmail.com> <DDF306CD-EFC5-4E24-8ADE-64C432CEEAE4@cloudflare.com> <CAAZdMaeXxA=UC5afPfi-U_zzJYtVVLZtkPvP2hAZmqpqzj5DTw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWp97aT0zN5WjSQBydFra_kWLsZG0BckS8qeRBXUFpvYw@mail.gmail.com> <397C9A5D-BD80-4C58-83DC-02EB66BF0390@cloudflare.com> <CAErg=HGJonPJJdU9AmL8YsywML_7sOCPsXVbbaVNr4YW0Md98w@mail.gmail.com> <E0B8B6EF-48D5-4A78-A8A8-83D44F04D3A2@dukhovni.org>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:33:07 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVnurcX=zfyOa-yr=CFnMiUuHAE3WD3Y6FCPFTwyQbxvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/WhSI7HSiRUy-JA_amKNdQeQdi6o>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Certificate compression draft
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 03:33:11 -0000

On 7 March 2017 at 13:32, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> Fewer WebPKI CAs (which are all trusted) seems like an improvement to me.
> Though I doubt that compression efficiency would be a major factor in such
> an outcome.

Like Ryan, I would rather not create any systemic biases in favour of
certain parties, however minor we each subjectively believe those
biases might be.