IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah@jacaranda.org> Tue, 08 December 2009 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <djhopwood@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1753E3A693D for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:09:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.009, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKGP2DEFQqDv for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.25]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239313A6858 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so551564eyd.51 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:09:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=cNjUSFpCwWszF0/q1fRza96ivQwhDcLlkRJEWLCw3oA=; b=dkB+QoCZEAASX2o+DlE7yHaKsmJBcZPmnekWksAdfFWMwnW/T4v7m3IA7w8lUqp6aa RCdMUnBNWIU7Ol7ivxi5H7pkXoLJPKY7VHJlsEkwP5HbbQ5nWcIXpvu+O3dhyhVbJ87l VaN6kvMOnlf+b9p6N+A1G+PLMHX4aCGPAJzpY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=VZhNhU1YOcuU6oohwWfLXVykcMe3Y8F7WO47O8Mw3cseHmhDLg1Qr6ZgxUScpNteyA zW6hBLLVLwq7J8j5uJUYCr+p1hoyT8QBfHIqc1pcJ16wc+Y3zrlrPIzQZDCQ3vYdF8M/ zGzio2oYmNNm059JT8Q6OBH9zhAgN7ny23v/8=
Received: by 10.213.0.144 with SMTP id 16mr7828531ebb.37.1260230942404; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.0.2? (5adcc5d2.bb.sky.com [90.220.197.210]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm3708435ewy.15.2009.12.07.16.09.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: David-Sarah Hopwood <djhopwood@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <4B1D9928.6090407@jacaranda.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:09:12 +0000
From: David-Sarah Hopwood <david-sarah@jacaranda.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <20091207220244.DA1A06C5242@kilo.networkresonance.com> <20091207223714.GR861@Sun.COM> <20091207230059.BB2226C5249@kilo.networkresonance.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091207230059.BB2226C5249@kilo.networkresonance.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD42DA560BA3D6D5EFA0C927C"
Subject: Re: [TLS] Closing some open comments on draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:09:17 -0000

Eric Rescorla wrote:
> At Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:37:14 -0600,
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>> RFC5056 needs to be an actual, informative reference.  Also, since we
>> use both Finished messages this resembles the tls-unique-for-telnet CB
>> most:
>>
>>    The data used in the extension is similar to, but not the same as,
>>    the tls-unique and/or tls-unique-for-telnet channel bindings

the data used in the tls-unique and/or tls-unique-for-telnet channel binding
types

>>    described in [I-D.altman-tls-channel-bindings], however this
>>    extension is not a generic-purpose RFC 5056 [RFC5056] channel binding

generic-purpose -> general-purpose

>>    facility."
>  
> Sold.

+1.

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood  ⚥  http://davidsarah.livejournal.com

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status