IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Wed, 28 May 2014 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A984E1A0377 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 00:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaDTBFcpbSvv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF1F1A0019 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 00:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4S7252O009061 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 May 2014 03:02:05 -0400
Received: from [10.34.2.127] (dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com [10.34.2.127]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4S72385012862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 May 2014 03:02:04 -0400
Message-ID: <1401260523.2336.7.camel@dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 09:02:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXaLKmxXL01hQEdxHSNGt3nZQQNBLDD5H2LqBzTo3vK4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXaLKmxXL01hQEdxHSNGt3nZQQNBLDD5H2LqBzTo3vK4g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/X7gk7pQgCgaqtzflyROpWXuX-Ow
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Proposed text for removing renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 07:02:12 -0000

On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 14:39 -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I was incapable of doing much real work on a plane last week, so I did this:
> 
> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/41
> 
> Here I'm proposing changes that remove renegotiation.  There are some
> pieces that are probably separable, and other pieces that might be
> controversial, so I'll try to highlight those and then we can discuss
> the merits of various approaches.  You know, the regular process.

What problem does this removal solves? There is no motivation written in
your text.

regards,
Nikos

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status