Re: [TLS] Fwd: [tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni] Fix superfluous padding edge cases. (#258)

Christopher Patton <> Tue, 11 August 2020 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688AF3A0B35 for <>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UznlzbfJl5z7 for <>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D323A0ACF for <>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id t23so10348429qto.3 for <>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6h4HN0s3dV8z/4U1gv4Iu+c26Z32rGDo8WYMlInEez0=; b=TEWuKmntlHAyHdBJWyzeNjxA1mCyE8kQOSlvRiTWnzF7kVWx7o+hBCM642XiMERyiH 71H8jJue1/WW+ylLjjmiQRgYe9y/13INFwknDnFLw6ru/YSIw2uvw/fHijgHd6mvQR6t 1Ng3g19VhkNHYOoPgd3c8tBDaua4oleV7kgrg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6h4HN0s3dV8z/4U1gv4Iu+c26Z32rGDo8WYMlInEez0=; b=PhI2MOuN8A8sUR58nLXKDHCjEaPjjEnBSTom5BZMBUZYfJ/X3uwX+hqNdxq+mdpIT2 wlRkPUFXq0WDYZy9AHUWDXmXc4CT1/4W192Dvvg7McBCvcibThWc0mnWs43dzsjsU51q Esf+FZM0wN0YFSnhfIbUWLN6y+x5wNV283++fruP1sgmsf6ovrE60pzgMOsD4M0SI9WI DqqpBJCGIzyfjtopVs2VNQNxBFMBjd0sB3pPUbNaoqIg9biOb9iqQoNLqJdWIh3Pl+MC fgv16xqQHOl40J8xSTfh1X5XOC+ZVcHLcqnqOrqTNqwazYmbUR2O44VuOP6xO9VM0NRf 2+ig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315+16ovF3CaoRJDytzl3RHJv0xrr/Y6Bdgi9m21qhWo61BL98D tmUOBEeK8KSZQB3UeS6sqc0T/swGCyWralWzb3AkXWpz6Ao=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjXXJyaDcmtAq8IYL0nvrAtvQRMMcmn1i/31USf5HK+7PmAuzh3bgE53yT1iy6Eh7+t2LjFTa1BR9svyzeOgg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2a6f:: with SMTP id l44mr2816588qtl.278.1597174400324; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Christopher Patton <>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:33:09 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: "Salz, Rich" <>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <>, "" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c6b7c105ac9f249e"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fwd: [tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni] Fix superfluous padding edge cases. (#258)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:33:22 -0000

HI all,

    Am I alone in being concerned that the efficiency of github
>     for some is leading to others with different workflows
>     being left out of discussion?

This is probably my fault, I apologize. I've been working with Chris Wood
on editorial changes to the draft. These are intended to be purely
presentational-- I figured it was OK to proceed off-list, since we haven't
changed the spec at all. Does anyone object to us proceeding?

Chris Patton