[TLS] Prepending "TLS" to registry names

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Thu, 02 March 2017 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E79128B37 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:55:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BGAU-3ffwzAa for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2DE127601 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n127so149744174qkf.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:55:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=xMJFhFtvypj1uSk8SPG8LdFqltjYCyNcsrU0PFCU6yM=; b=gOj65LHO72drRazn3OvH6fTtR7RtOqfLzXQ12lTFsg8390I039W+8ig7RiqiLBX9rV CphAePr1mTtk4SpjC2JzC4f9d3PqYge0T1OG2ao7lQdQ5Xw1bFPHwki0A2NWBXiOOD3z ge0JZCIt3akrP7oL7M10taVWIWGUTkvADHy8E=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date :message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=xMJFhFtvypj1uSk8SPG8LdFqltjYCyNcsrU0PFCU6yM=; b=V78ejyqR8/CDGcgFo1qFx7IVHj24gq30d1yyusdUcGDWJsA357ZcQX2Kr2BwEjL8df XisXtQ7tTuRG32osiKrlt97BCJKwjbJjSmsPxU/QwwL3Ua6RedRzTlSpD+DvhwxTTt0Q OKcbRvAH/HladTP9tohe0aE04cYpJTTszrc7XPfOnluXiZfWMvy0OcsQbPBG1o2a+JIE OzYw1R2gr0DlK7ZGyaSnirpIpTAEJqlT7AQv/G2bYFJvIRhSMn7wV/GAeo2M34LhY0E0 EWmA+H917Vut5qCpzDuNOSpLIjAVOxNV5Sac3c871y1CHa1QTkbHyQvzSSlAc79PFz7c a54A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mmLh+VWRG+5dJt+UvBo3CIvofhK93FxGmgq4QjaEFqf/IrOdYbiUan0PtGDikKTw==
X-Received: by 10.55.100.67 with SMTP id y64mr20379967qkb.290.1488495323274; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.0.92] ([96.231.228.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t25sm6306780qkl.29.2017.03.02.14.55.21 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:55:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 17:55:20 -0500
Message-Id: <453016F5-98A0-4BD7-8ACD-0B2EAF5F912D@sn3rd.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/XeKlYgAFr6MVvH4CHWPP_LMw0d0>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Prepending "TLS" to registry names
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:55:26 -0000

Some of the TLS registry names begin with “TLS” and some don’t.  I added “TLS” to the beginning of names of registries in https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates. Maybe we should do the same here?  PR for proposed change:

https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pull/32

spt