Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Mon, 21 October 2019 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B4D12099D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qhc6X0tAv_G for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C36B5120976 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id l21so14728205lje.4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S5gpoAQOqBC+x5K+D6yzbWiassMd+7LC5H04YGdZ8Xg=; b=V00Uru0n5kqEs2IAyWqu24muRaKsPkIcFMJftSzL86yn6XCY1PVZhtNOqsJHZJdQxm PRoKabqhdr+/QNy6qo1TtN1RKJQCWv1PtTRe+0TKutIYWkX3RAqQtL/dgTAf6j1uCULc y4Xy0wTwKkXCwsZSlK8L4dUtlUrKuGPaYS7v8q6kGtgOt9KKPMglZ97DQDC5r9hyifi3 cehExfzVlUVvy5xFAFutv/lpvM8dADg83TtMsn5/eHiamCmjRgQeI/LDS+WMAbLiHddz 3OrX2vHLPBL89AF588B7FnC0lke3CazIqwprujkylBml5Q240YeOLjRXpD9ugXR+e03g CHMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S5gpoAQOqBC+x5K+D6yzbWiassMd+7LC5H04YGdZ8Xg=; b=jJqtSQL65s6x0YVg8cnYCmQL2nYuW5qLdKLg6biHV6qeQZ8xb4gRXWrX4YUJz1b+Bc 0Bbt10dH8jBAQfXRNkTehSiOI2c412vOjtpWcp9za1T5XdYByJghrq0iTEeWr064bc3e xkpQ0p3kCgcq48zyoKhjymIAuuQpeNBy+xh2xdTHUwCWkUS5IEtPk4otFafexyhXzQ0w Vh34bCRywXmdL4G/u+KmmCrx4lQUpVcANxDyvVYFC6hSWlQOSZVICDoS9mGXBR5CGdNB 5kd6mAFXdEvnyILCbAQzrk/kBZm5GqYfXYcj1YiFXOf/rVo70XuO78ARZHsTaK2bMJ1F QOrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUF6en2jsb+fsJOuG/Y8KekyxyQsZxtWX2smQSEPWPOfEr+2Exp z+T9PfNOxSivAIK7kvno7Do6AEWj/yeDnYknKg8NKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyz4PjWIeAWPrCufWuZHoIaBak02Cs+Ihe8IzT8gOfOSamFQnvnt/ShdD7uS4eKtLn7yTcno8NlkGtUh6sdFfg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:237:: with SMTP id z23mr16310049ljn.93.1571688554957; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6Sw3f7du3JYxfcWSZje1zjDzsRBQyDjob-AvzjWeZzKW7g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPbw_KOo_ieSqkksYPeLtb9DufBz628oFPYc_Ue4S9iww@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwB+7Jt2TLJSQh3q=Roizdt2=9jCBa9nq8KRxRo=86uZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNBtDK7q175tseEUiCVds=khj4xXYJZRf7GU9VGNDJ_Tg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sz6xHtFWjOKrLp3sp9MpC-SoU9Sx=vk22ditjShA7B=Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOnE+gyNu7GarAfO0bptoPfzQQ=VKeWLdpJBDM=E4yhzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxWE66jPRbnBRtwNSn3L+uNFkoFBbYNOBAkKDN05qotoA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOy8ogJrmFajxX1pqjqgnE61gE=c3CWz+pp34NWHmGKbw@mail.gmail.com> <03e15760-dfce-cd7b-baea-56ac70d92192@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBMquubsGvt8UssiyFU_ZuQK67rHN_KBXY+iKSNayJFZew@mail.gmail.com> <d9402fe2-2ab3-f60f-c478-dc1df5bd4402@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBNC9YBGMs0b84DFDB-FU7fKXpzX+HP1H5KRcjYJ7kXr3w@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Szd0dAh-h_oGzD9-fvfm3bYZbFnFrfmEmnbtz6OcmH=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Szd0dAh-h_oGzD9-fvfm3bYZbFnFrfmEmnbtz6OcmH=UQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 13:08:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNWeTs6wrqdWcRrM9CjxdyO3csWDuQ8kak0UAL+S+eK-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000425a305957142fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/XqyupGxCfXzQI3oaj3aupjJn7M4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-esni feedback
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:09:19 -0000

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:07 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:03 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>; wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:48 PM Stephen Farrell <
>> stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not yet, that's true. OTOH, the 260 value wasn't decided on
>>> the list either that I recall.
>>
>>
>> IIRC it was there at the time of adoption.
>>
>
> Yes, it's there in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-tls-esni-00.
>
> I think we should do better than "pretty sure it's right", though.
>

I don't believe that's what I said.

-Ekr


> thanks,
> Rob
>