IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Products supporting TLS 1.0 & some other high-level questions

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 06 October 2014 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B131A0334 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rk5y54T0waFO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com [72.246.2.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6461A0331 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 19:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F31284F6; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 02:36:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay02.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A578C284F5; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 02:36:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ustx2ex-cashub.dfw01.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.73]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8109C202A; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 02:36:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.2.28]) by ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.73]) with mapi; Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:36:30 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 21:36:30 -0500
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Products supporting TLS 1.0 & some other high-level questions
Thread-Index: Ac/hDf8MAVguCvlvS8q/oNZBPyrTDwAABfUw
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C71D2F8F8550@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CACsn0c=kDE1mS_jksKtrOOgWLgcocB+chBsdsFZggSJZDvwhwg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM1uytPVgqC4OioX3ZaKY07sURaXsP9ov=Q4oeYYiCtJg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBM1uytPVgqC4OioX3ZaKY07sURaXsP9ov=Q4oeYYiCtJg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Y-iNvrYVN9tRFrE5eGpgYSq7vUY
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Products supporting TLS 1.0 & some other high-level questions
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 02:36:35 -0000

I think http/2, which many people want because of perceived efficiencies, will be a major factor for pulling TLS 1.3 especially if the latter adopts ChaCha/Poly and/or X25519.

If I were a conspiracy fan, I'd be worried about the close professional relationship between the authors of the TLS  1.3 and HTTP/2 RFC's :)

	/r$

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email