Re: [TLS] rfc7366: is encrypt-then-mac implemented?

Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg@polarssl.org> Sat, 01 November 2014 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mpg@polarssl.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7801A1B9A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 16:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lIToSy8btxsg for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 16:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vps2.offspark.com (vps2.brainspark.nl [141.138.204.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D270E1A1A96 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 16:45:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=polarssl.org; s=exim; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=CPqYoMbGiq54zF3pYMcznVe9WhJ6vY/RtCXWHd3W754=; b=KtTtdOfbU0ihLwIi5sTZQXslLmqGD5rDsPlkHPCjB0plJiy1vS5nWwrei9acR36U/EJiirHOmWehLTuplUK0Om+h8CpGlpjPSncWYWVtGvsQLouhtskobxrLD711sWlED6qNOwtCHFbfowiiM6fAodym1mDYpnSRv+s93POT/3E=;
Received: from mna75-11-88-161-199-191.fbx.proxad.net ([88.161.199.191] helo=[192.168.0.12]) by vps2.offspark.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <mpg@polarssl.org>) id 1XkiM5-00071Z-WC; Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:45:15 +0100
Message-ID: <5455708E.60606@polarssl.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:45:18 +0100
From: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg@polarssl.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Yngve N. Pettersen" <yngve@spec-work.net>, tls@ietf.org
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C739B9DB35D@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <op.xonuwux33dfyax@killashandra.invalid.invalid> <54555161.1040606@polarssl.org> <op.xon248yd3dfyax@killashandra.invalid.invalid> <54556D32.80100@polarssl.org> <op.xon6jerc3dfyax@killashandra.invalid.invalid>
In-Reply-To: <op.xon6jerc3dfyax@killashandra.invalid.invalid>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 88.161.199.191
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mpg@polarssl.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vps2.offspark.com)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/YKvcj1pErWpzfBzdoBZbb962rwA
Subject: Re: [TLS] rfc7366: is encrypt-then-mac implemented?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 23:45:24 -0000

On 02/11/2014 00:36, Yngve N. Pettersen wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:30:58 +0100, Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard  
> <mpg@polarssl.org> wrote:
> 
> That looks fairly OK to me.
>
Cool, we're converging.

> A possible tweak one could add, is to define
> 
>      encrypted_content = ENC(content + padding + padding_length)
> 
> and use that in the formula instead.
> 
As Peter pointed out after the first version of my proposal, we need two
versions: one for TLS 1.0 (no IV) and one for higher versions, to point out the
IV is included.

Manuel.