IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_xxx_GCM_SHAxxx

Alexandre Anzala-Yamajako <anzalaya@gmail.com> Wed, 12 March 2014 13:35 UTC

Return-Path: <anzalaya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824B71A0989 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KYZJucL50cOa for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BCE1A096E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ks9so4098758vcb.41 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=hdMDNwtveNQZcyjFV+hSUNjASfUYszBOOu5Ykz/6IHc=; b=T3K2ZLy2nUaTjx0RiT9S52+zTXMRauvIbPvJxKAjUN3hBnkp04+mezkvLq5sGnpjDI uylcSMdoSdM79WIB2Upjs6n4UDjb2wH2oE5YSPPupNyGZq8aD6iMJ0veubLY/pishoYG Ra/KZZpD1Axfq8+PkiNhAyyws8rbQAPF5kHFKP7DzPKOazdO0krh+WnYz9iyHPEcKk2C bkfo59vGdRnhTjUiTO2KjSt2fzXDzj/yg4gs+BroV+eZ+VZC0rmRYFPsQCUTA78ER9Ir Q3wyVG5Rwbdwv9OrjNAwMkJXlJHo3ci21HibPYVhqY3s1dq/+xbEefgUrQ4+hRDOgrrZ AXsQ==
X-Received: by 10.52.126.107 with SMTP id mx11mr263564vdb.41.1394631314685; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.221.3.72 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2643d802-f33b-4caf-b5e1-4df42d59814e@email.android.com>
References: <CAK3OfOgw70LVQsykxNZSH9+4Dn2inBTx0q0KrvujS1LOY1i9tg@mail.gmail.com> <532024EF.4060607@polarssl.org> <53205A3F.5080802@fifthhorseman.net> <2643d802-f33b-4caf-b5e1-4df42d59814e@email.android.com>
From: Alexandre Anzala-Yamajako <anzalaya@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:34:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHE9jN0-8QLCCTp8Mmem3wvSXJrMrLxTSOv67Rs2-wMJxM+y9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alyssa Rowan <akr@akr.io>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec520f6891ac6d604f468e8d7"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ZuqPzblE5EyR4S8-zI5pp4YPwd0
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Still missing: TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_xxx_GCM_SHAxxx
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:35:22 -0000

Just out of curisoity, is anyone aware of scenarios where people chose
*_anon suites to save on the bandwidth of sending certificates ?


-- 
Alexandre Anzala-Yamajako

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status