[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 08 August 2021 07:34 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3EC3A1FA7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 00:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=fYYZ0oBW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Wq4E0kL8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uRkNh7aqlF9h for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 00:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECE123A1F80 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 00:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3F55C00E1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:34:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 08 Aug 2021 03:34:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm3; bh=KbanhMEbnLI fByN3GWvAsy815iJ+npgx7tQhgwe0stQ=; b=fYYZ0oBW6Dz1XOxSgGNwpjqnKG7 a76Z74CLidt3lsjhMheJgQWRpc1eDTkfqHZGRr4mNErvmEUqalBIYHDT37xLqtlS 0eXKRUSOC4zhjcfcP9W7+Y0+sTyBdSZqnS/P5yWEipSjfiI87rcbEbR25yu3IIkR 9erYMlb0Y2JYBVeLH4sChVQuCAIERVsAHdx6MDzvJ+7MKe41R4GV+sATMW/+7TCW 1nsfi9AHK0l4wzh9SGgNaPZBvt16sMzYid/7fyob0+ZHsBBbSGNowBg5CiqTFfUo JzqZmbn3bcQBpiwPzmOfb3qwtfyYLI4MuAkOsbbSBI6jtd+tVmGqdoTO4NA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=KbanhMEbnLIfByN3GWvAsy815iJ+npgx7tQhgwe0stQ=; b=Wq4E0kL8 yXp/VXyLxQ7eA+V+4UklCdeTrYhcO2Phxwn+8LqOgiVvts9RtaQf/5x5XfUEXaOA 8BBVlNpEe4O2meCvkfT/5TkP52L/GvBj0ntKb/3fSPUBbId7Cnc/tt59Y8yd5/Vi iHTSE9q/H/1VtKVwCmS6qi1Lv/Ffbcd+a/DHz2Ua2n9gKM1G6vqD7KKbzUpz8LXy HX5FbbOqe5jK5ooOTXAI7WeLKsCYkoqZWAyYsVfT7xt1PjAF2GCmHkdRwrJeM4sB Oj9kqJiOwYUbkWbqBjW7OuoqiOG8qHRaUQF1UM9Dq3ayg/u4uD4GzaQZtiPPkc5J +C8wfWiKoNcNsw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:64gPYW-giMyxGbOWYrpwVDwKmzkm0h3iGHRbZ699zKsoHiawtJCdRw> <xme:64gPYWslmkZdLGADw_3XjkXUZLwdjAUDzPlfr13fRLOiqjaVSzcoikCDWO0ZvrNVo rvIJ6INqmqErM5MQQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:64gPYcBoRM3o_ehzozKLWdP6MUJfSNoLVs1RyZsS0Jq3MtwXrCLDxcLkrCuugsbGnqTC1MfpSOVpF7-UsYN1WyjwdqQD95hj8x7ZF4FBOlO9GK9mNF_sq2TTj9CS77V67w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrjeeggddutdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:64gPYeeFIDLMQ5FTOVHMvPwzkk11NjWtYAAruFuNV7W-OVxUU_sY3A> <xmx:64gPYbNRXo9TeUBNk6s1v8oXuLh3gMcGOC4m8vqrtjP2aR9clCZtkA> <xmx:64gPYYk3etTsw1miOVvtYPxd6UJFD2VX5oQrW0QcK5h1SP6e5qBuoQ> <xmx:7IgPYUbCkMhGL--RnY6fA_LxIozBiIIBG4u-cXYilWxWuI6jiSLBsg>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Aug 2021 03:34:03 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4697178928630945014=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210808073404.ECE123A1F80@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 00:34:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_0Y5b84PZ2EBzGF626PSn-ztgRw>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 07:34:19 -0000
Issues ------ * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+2/-1/π¬8) 2 issues created: - Split mode correlation attacks (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/513 - Lessen possibility of client implementation choices undermining GREASE cover (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/512 3 issues received 8 new comments: - #513 Split mode correlation attacks (6 by chris-wood, davidben, pkelsey, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/513 - #512 Lessen possibility of client implementation choices undermining GREASE cover (1 by cbartle891) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/512 - #429 Clarify handling of transcript at client? (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/429 1 issues closed: - Clarify handling of transcript at client? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/429 * tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-0/π¬0) 1 issues created: - Not clear why 0-RTT doesn't provide perfect forward secrecy (by cbartle891) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1235 * tlswg/tls-flags (+3/-0/π¬3) 3 issues created: - IANA registry rules (by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/issues/11 - Extra length octet (by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/issues/10 - Repository maintenance (by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/issues/9 2 issues received 3 new comments: - #11 IANA registry rules (2 by martinthomson, yoavnir) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/issues/11 - #10 Extra length octet (1 by yoavnir) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/issues/10 * tlswg/dtls13-spec (+0/-1/π¬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #251 Establishing New Associations with Existing Parameters - SHOULD / please add description of the alternatives (1 by boaks) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/251 1 issues closed: - Establishing New Associations with Existing Parameters - SHOULD / please add description of the alternatives https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/251 Pull requests ------------- * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate (+2/-0/π¬0) 2 pull requests submitted: - Remove RFC5246 updates, change Section 2 intro text such that the extension is always included. (by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/pull/19 - Drop RFC7525 Updates. (by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate/pull/18 * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+30/-19/π¬40) 30 pull requests submitted: - Remove sentence that is redundant with the paragraph that follows (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/511 - Clarify ambiguous grammar (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/510 - Clarify the document's assumption of restricted attacker location (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/509 - Rework Handshaking with ClientHelloInner to remove conflicts and... (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/508 - Replace broader, conflicting description of client retry_config use... (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/507 - Adjust caption of Figure 1 (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/506 - More accurately describe provider plaintext access (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/505 - Fix several typos (by pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/504 - Define EncodedClientHelloInner before outer extensions. (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/503 - not sure if omitting CH in IANA registry for ech_outer_extensions is right or not (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/502 - Fix a bit of formatting and remove ref to resolved issue #384 (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/501 - ech_retry_requested is a gonner (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/500 - trial decryption configuration - "both sides" seems wrong (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/499 - retry configs: tweak about subsequent connections (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/498 - Try clarify an odd MUST in 6.1.5 (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/497 - Clarify cardinality via the use of the (non-redudant:-) length field (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/496 - optional configids seems wrong, maybe random is better? (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/495 - config IDs aren't really optional (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/494 - A bit more text to introduce EncodedClientHelloInner (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/493 - Bit more text on nominal backend processing (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/492 - Expand on config_ids. (by davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/491 - Clarify a bit why server might send retry configs (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/490 - fe0c->fe0d (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/489 - sensible-pickers (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/488 - note potential config_id collisions (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/487 - redundant length (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/486 - note experiment (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/485 - HPKE isn't draft-08 any more (by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/484 - Update codepoints to -13. (by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/483 - Add -12 changelog. (by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/482 15 pull requests received 40 new comments: - #511 Remove sentence that is redundant with the paragraph that follows (1 by cbartle891) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/511 - #509 Clarify the document's assumption of restricted attacker location (3 by chris-wood, pkelsey) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/509 - #502 not sure if omitting CH in IANA registry for ech_outer_extensions is right or not (2 by chris-wood, davidben) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/502 - #496 Clarify cardinality via the use of the (non-redudant:-) length field (2 by ekr, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/496 - #495 optional configids seems wrong, maybe random is better? (7 by cbartle891, chris-wood, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/495 - #494 config IDs aren't really optional (1 by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/494 - #493 A bit more text to introduce EncodedClientHelloInner (4 by chris-wood, davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/493 - #492 Bit more text on nominal backend processing (6 by chris-wood, davidben, ekr, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/492 - #491 Expand on config_ids. (2 by davidben, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/491 - #489 fe0c->fe0d (2 by chris-wood, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/489 - #487 note potential config_id collisions (1 by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/487 - #486 redundant length (6 by davidben, ekr, sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/486 - #485 note experiment (1 by sftcd) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/485 - #482 Add -12 changelog. (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/482 - #481 Allow the client-facing server to GREASE the extension. (1 by chris-wood) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/481 19 pull requests merged: - Replace broader, conflicting description of client retry_config use... https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/507 - Clarify ambiguous grammar https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/510 - Remove sentence that is redundant with the paragraph that follows https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/511 - More accurately describe provider plaintext access https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/505 - Adjust caption of Figure 1 https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/506 - Fix several typos https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/504 - Clarify a bit why server might send retry configs https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/490 - sensible-pickers https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/488 - Allow the client-facing server to GREASE the extension. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/481 - Define EncodedClientHelloInner before outer extensions. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/503 - trial decryption configuration - "both sides" seems wrong https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/499 - note experiment https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/485 - Clarify cardinality via the use of the (non-redudant:-) length field https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/496 - Fix a bit of formatting and remove ref to resolved issue #384 https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/501 - Expand on config_ids. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/491 - ech_retry_requested is a gonner https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/500 - HPKE isn't draft-08 any more https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/484 - Update codepoints to -13. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/483 - Grease and HRR leak https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/419 * tlswg/tls-flags (+1/-2/π¬0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Seven bits? (by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/pull/8 2 pull requests merged: - Editorial WGLC comment by Victor Dukhovni https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/pull/7 - Seven bits? https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags/pull/8 * tlswg/dtls-conn-id (+2/-0/π¬0) 2 pull requests submitted: - Use same trailing ) position. (by boaks) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/123 - Use wording similar to other length field. (by boaks) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id/pull/122 * tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator (+1/-0/π¬0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Nick/aug5reviews (by grittygrease) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator/pull/74 * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls (+1/-0/π¬0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Removal of varint encoding (by hannestschofenig) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/36 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni * https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts * https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls * https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team
- [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Dra⦠Repository Activity Summary Bot