[TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile vs HTTP/2.0

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Fri, 01 April 2016 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6625A12D175 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uJjACfMec3_i for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E5C12D0E6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 00:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99EC26317D; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:54:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from dhcp-10-40-1-102.brq.redhat.com ([]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u317sqn2008548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Apr 2016 03:54:53 -0400
Message-ID: <1459497291.3034.20.camel@redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 09:54:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C2374E@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C2374E@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com []); Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:54:54 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_L8FZDqovJ97GPAnaqREtGcqDyM>
Subject: [TLS] TLS 1.2 Long-term Support Profile vs HTTP/2.0
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 07:54:57 -0000

On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 12:36 +0000, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> After a number of, uh, gentle reminders from people who have been
> waiting for
> this, I've finally got around to posting the TLS-LTS draft I
> mentioned a while
> back.  It's now available as:
> > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-gutmann-tls-lts-00.txt

I liked the idea of an LTS profile for TLS 1.2, however I just realized
that RFC7540 [0] blacklists (with no rationale) 3 out of the 4 LTS
ciphersuites and I'm wondering how practically useful will be that


[0]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7540#appendix-A