Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Sun, 17 June 2018 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99DF4130DDE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qXyP-QJAB7A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B66911277CC for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id s9-v6so12524206qtg.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=w4cEORejy9D0csc9xKlAlvjEFE/tE7g8iHuCef2GmMQ=; b=UCb9a5Tpr0vqrrIEVpqkHe0ADU1oX/EeVr2C+FbANU37FPNf6FrlpPi0G81zE+0Zc/ 9Z5n1kT3AlAmBWvhWv6Eza8ogPTcnHX5Qc+Bz/mnPnwtBXZVAbPvCbVWrqzvF/ZDYig4 kU4nQKxFVzcjLSc6FG8Yw4PU7lzFwqi9Vz0Cg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=w4cEORejy9D0csc9xKlAlvjEFE/tE7g8iHuCef2GmMQ=; b=igtKNWTbXjQsjXNjRhQJucT+aqBFSO8Bpp/lt+O2QH1T86f9ECg/9pTaG9bmpUXNZK IayJJhefHMT/zOeB4vMWT8gOfeG0+pjfsmxoIAFZA55/TvDXs8cASSKvUPKY1Ca4NRjc BUVtMkR5G8DAawqNxUbxZeiIFMHU1jDroBAPTf9cvwuR0nlhVZLb/+mTJYTR+kkCw5D1 2VhBrmLFmFr2csz0BKr7XkK87KyG0HWLn7/5OVCLCCROSBjpjLlJcJkqD/zy9Dw0j+xp AYfN+9kwBXiKEfjkZ4YgJKmtiKWG2XE8StIBcsgPN0FK5yl65WB7Mf4g+7BMMSx2IWzJ tL7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E08addktwza5B3p8wcqJlY5jDTc0EIE73jSN9YRpYlfmvNhCq0i FPuvhX3dpMpLkrWdP7EueC6yuA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKT/0r5Cix5wprE3nY2aB1sMCA819pzNasT7QxGd8Uvg4s5QBrFLRB2yetJ0p5T1vgINNIhsw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4407:: with SMTP id j7-v6mr6855058qtn.117.1529204682775; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.225.148]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m70-v6sm9031785qkl.72.2018.06.16.20.04.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Jun 2018 20:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR14MB23560D791932A8CB164C592D917F0@BN7PR14MB2356.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:04:40 -0400
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A8AAB5A1-41FF-41C4-B6BB-6E59E0487B88@sn3rd.com>
References: <BN7PR14MB23560D791932A8CB164C592D917F0@BN7PR14MB2356.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ben Personick <ben.personick@iongroup.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_SDtSLX7mOiCeiS1DYQuBarTk-g>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Mail regarding draft-ietf-tls-tls13
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:04:46 -0000


> On Jun 12, 2018, at 16:15, Ben Personick <ben.personick@iongroup.com>; wrote:
> 
>   I have read some articles saying the draft is approved, but on looking it seems not to be, I am a little unsure why the draft has been stuck in this seemingly nearly finished but not quite ready state for 3 months.

The draft has been approved by the IESG.  Once a draft is approved it moves over to the RFC editor (and there’s some IANA review too); here’s a link to the RFC editorial process [0]; here’s a link to their publication queue [1].  3 months is about what I expected in terms of wait post approval.  We’re nearly there.

spt

[0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/pubprocess/
[1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/current_queue.php