IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Server-side missing_extension MUSTs

Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com> Wed, 13 July 2016 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <davemgarrett@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D768112D51A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59SemSLnBx-V for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x235.google.com (mail-yw0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B3D12B008 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x235.google.com with SMTP id j17so32334203ywg.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:22:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=XxUbxxMiX6i1NimfTCXeUT4ZANVJmrCyiZWpuwpQIEo=; b=tNv7c/9ZUcsSMKgSPXNV3c8gnMJ6J0X8nIxt32HMD0ML4OFQ2Ul6iuGMq9opuSXAqt RfNveuIetwNDCW0/4BVqJMNHyWTRIRr0FUMz3nnB23Lwhs49r+uJBE8iPo7UAqlIJTu3 aO0jFOtLYNVKgFyXD/j/e9OcmybWZ+asDW7u01iS0L9W26lUfQEt4Yzns5tVbFABGjXt 9kS3SVR2ke0Aj5Yvaxfs1sZEhFlxAeh0R+kmWrTGcypQ8Z+wRdxEmmcxPA+nkAadmGUN Nh/Ta0ASyd/ke//yVgRFbU1HufqpmlCs/Ovts/eqy+O+9RTZ2ZRv6mN13prHQmcB/Fcc SD7w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=XxUbxxMiX6i1NimfTCXeUT4ZANVJmrCyiZWpuwpQIEo=; b=JWSruiasAkzpbEJDTRR81+UCiQgQVUJxvaE3NcTxVg+zLokE1strGW3uZFym4QhG2j iuRszx8b/qUT2zSWlpcKgB0Fb35+YvH/X12gamC8/BsL9LQeLME5I6E/mXAlbamZlMHE Y6iaCJg9sq1a4M4y2CTOO/Dhj7IvXDr4qXaTxJhW8791/zD0UDUfOF+F5NGa0FiGoyqf f7Q2FeFLXvDhAO3vU4EoEXyFDdEojBOpWqdFM+fW+FZAR8t2GWyYqdKo3l/4zIvczrSU mA3mLfLiWF1SfPVEFZleejgYUH70mFEeB72wnHVX6Wm29DzVkKFcYvswyZP0QEu/3VZ0 WPsg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLWlopdK/IS4MwAe/kzKBfzQoWGMCl0iB85pQqj5evCz6h2kCDX+xVxkgVcPz/hQQ==
X-Received: by 10.129.120.82 with SMTP id t79mr4196047ywc.51.1468380130549; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dave-laptop.localnet (pool-71-185-27-22.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [71.185.27.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i62sm3592252ywd.11.2016.07.12.20.22.09 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Garrett <davemgarrett@gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 23:22:08 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-74-generic-pae; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; )
References: <CAF8qwaAAw6zA9jRPMQ5MXqHptBtsarhNPcH6KJzzSE-h1XiFDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBM=gN1wdnU4owWQ=kp-EJ5RNE2kcdyn4NCEy4w91yqhMg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBM=gN1wdnU4owWQ=kp-EJ5RNE2kcdyn4NCEy4w91yqhMg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201607122322.08815.davemgarrett@gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_kcVsxNZEqcpILkA9rzwg1SXFiI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Server-side missing_extension MUSTs
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 03:22:13 -0000

On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 10:51:22 pm Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I generally agree with David here.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> P.S. Back in Seattle, we had rough consensus to change the alert requirements [0] so that
> you didn't have to send alerts, but if you sent an alert, you had to send alert X. That's been
> on the TODO list for a while but expect a PR soon.
> 
> [0] https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/254

I am aware that discussion ended up on accepting sloppy error reporting as acceptable. Changing the disputed missing_extension alerts to SHOULDs would be an acceptable compromise if that decision is still actually going through.


Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email