[TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

Quynh Dang <quynh97@gmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2025 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <quynh97@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D05163461C for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njNct-C2wlNm for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4E871634611 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2025 21:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5499d2134e8so7066518e87.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1743568383; x=1744173183; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qFA6k8JiOJ3/JSBhAlY4MqpibRja7WSyr+DLNOByfMw=; b=e8T9uCfuZqPpz1EpDszzLinVnUM6A+Kl8bQeLFc9OHL7fl2l/BeUiZAeTV5NV9vh9Q lxblTbDdN6mQKjLEqtvYFgmYCJJ0CdFEPAWcCexy50aUtbsZPFP63T4Q63Dck6rbMx1S 5EY3ML5vCnPfthlBSDw0UcpTfcy5kcOYVuo6w6WkQ1DptxJFsb7d6ie9+H1sJYyoydEP h4p9p/bqEmo13kCNJvSMSeuvsfNDjrF8yV4Xil5q+fF8QlhcYrbn5X6KF0OtRFMAku3w Ds1m/gDc7nkYxHRCCkXkYWo1d/rrO0JMUkMdpWctH1m+DI5QlCvUJIdvyft6SXefheve kxIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1743568383; x=1744173183; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qFA6k8JiOJ3/JSBhAlY4MqpibRja7WSyr+DLNOByfMw=; b=sdo3ZVUzWCw6tNttE8oEy98V4vVyhlPp0rCvfXRSzSG7+RSEOpFq1RU1xcIyT/wfPg Z1NjIkRIpFM2DrDHGiAD6fcbjCzL8wI8plvCLBITLBKsxo4DYwU12l+wSkFc8+72CVeZ LZNTAqi39UuOrQLeLkaQoY4Mk7AN/hb9ciAr84ZtgKjPd5Pb8Y89+cypoCc48axPjI5D K0o3JONveJUTfPatpzQ3ns1uyDXhW78kcbUG//UNTxVCvbQwGk88/IgYKhbpLi8kYeA4 PWq4Yw34Zcr9F6E9+sCJfwq9RwgYh/NXpVGxIkZ5rr2PPpVmR5c7bRlS7JHP6hwFLVv7 2iVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxj5CngiTmV4UXfGLy6P0CMLcF2fyktfvO8k0onDzLwrTxV4j3x SDO1fpskQRB8kVvbYZSp5Soc1wzY6ZxAMFV5umkx0+sm0v18yJ3p7Jy1dDYDHDRlQCSSWffWEYO aZpAwhjSn6xith/naHkWQAuYPneogU0vU
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctaY/+rNGPm2/gXC0zURVqZtSCnp0PC+HFr6bR0rqhbT3yG4jivGUWzYwyQLpo nO7KVGUmH2m+EXpE1rX0MG3izA7hIgRn0fKSW1qI5JoUO3c55KICnXL6MFodsqlV9nKNziwKYWQ xv04zCI5IbeZR34KunGKdVRb5XO/ig
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHotPWhzjOCjEKqsBe5RbUsMcp2kYQely1U9OPbagmNDGgF9YVw+o7ugWLNYyogRX7tQmRYO7/JMk50RrJak1M=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1475:b0:30c:7a7:e87c with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-30ef91e9c23mr3088061fa.35.1743568382637; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <582917A1-F936-4A15-AE9D-342076605BE7@sn3rd.com> <f65014ed-9830-46ef-ad9e-4d9813b74f0c@betaapp.fastmail.com> <CAOp4FwRFo7NkbTf9Vi-WgwZrS712WU8kM_kKA3eiAByZey74Mw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOp4FwRFo7NkbTf9Vi-WgwZrS712WU8kM_kKA3eiAByZey74Mw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Quynh Dang <quynh97@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:32:45 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1Jrph-g2MFQ9gnTxii5zMZBq0wGSAzh08xy80UaGBAA1TSbzV-C1aKMK6-I
Message-ID: <CAE3-qLTEmSd0pmSjfY2tOY7E784yp=-EaU5mHCqxPBn5oESPnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016bde40631c4264b"
Message-ID-Hash: HH6ZB6EKO3OIQRYPIHDAXJKE36Z3DIZC
X-Message-ID-Hash: HH6ZB6EKO3OIQRYPIHDAXJKE36Z3DIZC
X-MailFrom: quynh97@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_mpM_7zT3_6XvRLOGsTambwdQhc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi TLS co-chairs,

I support adoption.

Regards,
Quynh.

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 12:09 AM Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I share the same view as Martin. I also support adoption but we should
> be very careful proceeding forward.
>
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 05:00, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> >
> > Like other pure ML-KEM uses, I am OK with adoption, though I might
> oppose Recommended: Y when it comes to that.  I also share John's concerns
> about key reuse, but would prefer to litigate that in the working group,
> rather than during adoption.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025, at 23:58, Sean Turner wrote:
> > > We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls;
> > > see [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption
> > > call for the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 I-D [1]. If
> > > you support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text,
> > > please send a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of
> > > this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. This
> > > call will close at 2359 UTC on 15 April 2025.
> > >
> > > In response to other WG adoption calls, Dan Bernstein pointed out some
> > > potential IPR (see [2]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in
> > > accordance with BCP 79.  Additional information is provided here; see
> > > [3].
> > >
> > > BCP 79 makes this important point:
> > >
> > >   (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use
> > >     technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides
> > >     that such a use is warranted.
> > >
> > > WG members can take this information into account during this adoption
> > > call to determine if we should adopt these drafts.
> > >
> > > Reminder:  This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the
> > > mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Joe and Sean
> > >
> > > [0]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/
> > > [1]
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement/
> > > [2]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/
> > > [3]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>