Re: [TLS] More clarity on resumption and session hash

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851F91A8847 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dX_1c2_iT8fO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E911A883B for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykfl8 with SMTP id l8so5053926ykf.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MAzLUDigdwtdPYMzQkdO94ZONqmDvK5/yE1of/lkYGY=; b=SOe2fFLKu8RErT9AhVYKDvCaBlbB4W3R4uQYDyK2Gg90+KMfpwoCKvnYWX5QEFiX7P 8VI7ifFqmBQYwhAZ88GBQKaAwxs0lW6fp8DFv7py8CYSfposE2fbrPCvdO0lyDhGXLhC 9PQqS2PDYPiJfg6pECeh5ZlSpAecNoLet9GxWfluyPTBIwoCU2hYxOd9Ketv7iybpcZr yCLE3bemLSpwIZdUSoD3xTFvywaGgTIQO+rJ16fX6QCfrZknvrFNWzhi9OJxhZAfWNem JvevcC35DVGJeVKwEI54h8yEunxA0+f9n6mpQdx8gz1YXnWO9ypXUiQawiZvgxne22Q/ Gpog==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.28.75 with SMTP id f51mr9273395yha.93.1432748596845; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.110.138 with HTTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150527172329.GI27628@localhost>
References: <CABcZeBM9UGZoifzDZZ3METMJJHa1ueX9CdHiccYTDW5UVC3RrA@mail.gmail.com> <20150527172329.GI27628@localhost>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:43:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUb5jDMMchxDxun_Kp9hYJ8_YFK_URrE=bXE8oej=zYCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_ofiZaalIjBs3oqCEHBvA6iX7Dk>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] More clarity on resumption and session hash
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 17:43:18 -0000

On 27 May 2015 at 10:23, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> Is a mid-flight reconfiguration of the client while reusing an old
> session cache likely?

Some clients persist session caches to disk.  That means completely
new software could load old sessions.