[TLS] Updated draft
Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Wed, 16 December 2009 21:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@networkresonance.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C703A68CD for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:31:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.99
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.744, BAYES_05=-1.11, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQyHUNw2i66B for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kilo.networkresonance.com (dhcp-128-107-47-89.cisco.com [128.107.47.89]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217673A67E5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kilo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kilo.networkresonance.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CC26C82B8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:32:02 -0800
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20091216213202.C5CC26C82B8@kilo.networkresonance.com>
Subject: [TLS] Updated draft
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:31:57 -0000
I've just submitted a new draft that is intended to enact most of Pasi's message as well as the noncontroversial editorial comments people have raised. Here is what I know still needs work: - The final resolution to what's sent in the legacy renegotiation case (see Pasi's message and the text I sent earlier). - New text for the identity section in Security considerations. (Pending closure on the list). - Make a pass through for clarity for implementors. (Also, I have some text here that Pasi contributed that I need to work in). If you think you made a comment which is noncontroversial that didn't make it in and/or I screwed up incorporating your comment, please let me know and I'll try to fix. For some reason, the submission tool is forcing manual submission. In the interim you can find it at: https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/ekr/draft-ietf-tls-renegotiate.txt Thanks, -Ekr
- [TLS] Updated draft Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Robert Dugal
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Marsh Ray
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Robert Dugal
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Marsh Ray
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Marsh Ray
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Michael D'Errico
- [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Update… Marsh Ray
- Re: [TLS] SCSV vs RI when both specified. Was: Up… Martin Rex
- [TLS] Apologies Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft - editorial tom.petch
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft tom.petch
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft Marsh Ray
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft tom.petch
- Re: [TLS] Updated draft: Minor Edits peter.robinson