Re: [TLS] Servers sending CA names

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 12 April 2023 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FEBC1524AA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMwCtDokQJRO for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D5F1C1522D9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 33CKF6m0028573 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:10:59 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=31x+1T9iNwmtiz98zw1P6gX0RIk9KidqudgSqNaf1ag=; b=CuenCUe7t0rOnnlDixS7rSpH6KTcAIrqG9J9e94xzJenJD2WvQ7L4ANcYxG4emXu9VsJ YNS9QBbTJVpdopzOGw3PT6anLe+O3RWjzWRKLxurMSejfzrQyKColJuWEC3KzNFcRiLD I9B0+hMANHcS2HloCIoQL65FSNexP4RFac7SW8YzYgHMtlcOdKERXxw9R7upEepwWxTa ptd+AtCzuwcRi/wZHwE9JuFgDQ2t0GetjXqhV3PlZig1VAVVlROtOJqU8Y1+DW9Ws1HW EnOlcICxyTVJzKqzRMepggHzQCSG7GWx9TGAHuJFPiUGW60h/w20tLrgtkyAnb9AzMTj sQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (a72-247-45-34.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.34] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ptw518m8p-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:10:59 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 33CI4J72017069 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 17:10:58 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.204]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pu3m02ymt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 17:10:58 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.26; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:10:58 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.026; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:10:58 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Servers sending CA names
Thread-Index: AQHZbX8pwn/3qKB5+0e2MbhfPCZiVq8oncOAgACaA4A=
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 21:10:58 +0000
Message-ID: <830D5F2A-CE14-4FB0-964D-2A11D9E275A1@akamai.com>
References: <51B56747-0347-43AB-93A7-C3FDF49902D2@akamai.com> <ZDcbv4g5-tjN-Mu-@straasha.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZDcbv4g5-tjN-Mu-@straasha.imrryr.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.71.23032500
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <37144E3BC086F34EB5919DE2911D681E@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-04-12_11,2023-04-12_01,2023-02-09_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=410 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2304120179
X-Proofpoint-GUID: x48FERLnA6Bl3t4ndCccccbl0xwPzaHw
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: x48FERLnA6Bl3t4ndCccccbl0xwPzaHw
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-04-12_11,2023-04-12_01,2023-02-09_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=339 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303200000 definitions=main-2304120180
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aHE50biIbi5v75sVNOYKRrAUxQg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Servers sending CA names
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 21:11:04 -0000

> I take you mean sending CA names as part of a certificate request.

Yes, that's what I meant.

>It looks perhaps like CA name lists are "more optional" in TLS 1.3 than
they were in TLS 1.2

That's kind of what spurred my question.