Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD31A13A7E0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWfbwe83opIV for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1069139EF2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:33:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NMWMf1010215; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:33:21 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=jan2016.eng; bh=xHaifEvI0KvT37gsqfawbrByw3BRdo7EUi8e5bhU3b8=; b=Rhx3tYRX9mJAPwLAEdS8ZJwumC+q7ZaxXCi8gVp6tfCNQ/0dDvvKZc2eQK92LFTHxVw5 OZxN1Rm/xB28UFv6m+mPQ473iFiEa4UrJT0iiC3KCwmSXlMYmSqbT+DEnFoF2r3QbevY kEmRCb/Q9fEvQAgsT1BQnmmB4kcUayi9G+VnQHRqyhFv/InposteDw3/KTrFJw6CZRwA jhLUqd8smkMh/QTdepsvawUCbECr5Er1QTf7X52jX1ByFBArg2KbXfp45eWg/f1e2u0B xKdRBzai7EKxm0lM8z3ZevAIQQdKUPwq/LEdNJgaD8d2Y42kz86UsXrEhM8oFw6W0Bax aw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 ([96.6.114.86]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2dqws2871b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 23:33:20 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v9NMVlHN000392; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:19 -0400
Received: from prod-mail-relay15.akamai.com ([172.27.17.40]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dr1jvg9f0-1; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:33:19 -0400
Received: from [172.19.17.86] (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay15.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F8F20066; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:33:19 -0600 (MDT)
To: "Ackermann, Michael" <MAckermann@bcbsm.com>, Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>, Adam Caudill <adam@adamcaudill.com>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <7E6C8F1F-D341-456B-9A48-79FA7FEC0BC1@gmail.com> <2EE9CB23-AEDA-4155-BF24-EBC70CD302EF@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB136816569A2AE2A9760C6E08D7410@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <557F43AC-A236-47BB-8C51-EDD37D09D5CB@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB13684F18AD75F4AE767CE35CD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <57CFBA2A-E878-47B0-8284-35369D4DA2DF@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB13680B6D5726D940C4C51B4BD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <0D75E20C-135D-45BC-ABE4-5C737B7491C9@akamai.com> <CY4PR14MB1368378B42A6C46B27F5EF01D7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <2AC16F9E-C745-43AD-82C1-D3953D51816C@fugue.com> <CY4PR14MB1368895DD0D72286635E4E83D7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <E37A3920-D7E3-4C94-89D0-6D3ECDEBCFF6@fugue.com> <CAFJuDmMZMRqvhyLFMoUo_5KPaVu3d4o2ZEQ_PiAOxWe7CtGgYQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHOTMVJZpWfdCSrzYXhb5-gyzpjuNzoEMjM9DywqRu6Q8op_vw@mail.gmail.com> <CY4PR14MB1368C52236964E69E1F124FBD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <17ae3ecd-ab72-59ac-c0fd-fb040dc67faa@akamai.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 17:33:18 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR14MB1368C52236964E69E1F124FBD7460@CY4PR14MB1368.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-23_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710230317
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-10-23_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1710230317
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aPbG0I6edKQ3M-l5JDvZHFKBx2U>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Publication of draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility-00
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 22:33:27 -0000

On 10/23/2017 05:09 PM, Ackermann, Michael wrote:
> No one I am aware of is pushing for a MitM capability to address
> this.   In fact it was one of the alternative solutions for which many
> implementation issues were cited at the Prague meeting and on this
> list.    But I would like to ask,  what is the solution that your
> company and others that you reference,  have solved this problem by
> implementing?   

Is not draft-rhrd-tls-tls13-visibility a MitM, in that the holder of the
SSWrapDH1 private key has the cryptographic capability to inject traffic
and modify plaintext for the affected connections?

-Ben