IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Tue, 10 April 2018 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4060C12D7E6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jhcloos.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BKNAuvWLUmuT for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [192.40.56.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77C791272E1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 54DFE1E22B; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:35:58 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore17; t=1523396158; bh=dhQ550mTMHt8e5V3JgPF8Bnvzxqq2CWylnRiqfVZFLE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=0iUpW8At1RPZSlKmyNi57ps9jCLWm+Ji08YJBdWYQnc4M1UMsX8mxeYSOuVcKU+jt eIRDBdJnrIL/BCu4FFFsHCW9wNyecPMWfER5yoGnvDSYczYLAVUjbc+z8wr2Hqgjya nzUPJWf+VjyOo+4gekcXJxbU0aVA33NKSTYy1Rv3WQxAIwC6mZj/dDOQTIbtr0z5bB RRAjUlojJZ83ZaQ7CPYl4vQkcGuc5E6YA2ZBcouniDB2ZRllK1Jp29KbCJMI1kCDVC Zt738QXuDHogv9mj2O+Zcu8+2nulSqEDOLxCvNQc044vJ/X1EF0CfIaXC9vnUAFT3e 6JAd+s45AIKDQ==
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id A697E10773E78; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:35:51 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Cc: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>, TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180410181412.GO17433@akamai.com> (Benjamin Kaduk's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:14:12 -0500")
References: <CAOgPGoAhzEtxpW5mzmkf2kv3AcugNy0dAzhvpaqrTSuMSqWqfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdXfVQ5ZYL+dTvFeTfOaz2NNPrqxvnWuqJkxu0aaKDF_Sg@mail.gmail.com> <FF625003-7174-4F11-8AB8-7F6F2DE28C4F@dukhovni.org> <20180410164858.GK17433@akamai.com> <CAHPuVdXGyO=zUA4TJgRDkWDStr_8esuPf9HLe12XtNjJsf4JBA@mail.gmail.com> <20180410181412.GO17433@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2018 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:35:51 -0400
Message-ID: <m3r2nmoibs.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/anBUChpRtDGnWgyYqo5VWf1VeCM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 21:36:01 -0000

[I only have part of the thread available, and so am replying to the
last message I see.]

I agree that the draft MUST explicitly support chains corresponding to
a NXDOMAIN or NODATA responses to have sufficient value.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

v2.15.0 | Report a Bug | By Email