[TLS] Re: [EXTERNAL] Confirming PQ+T Signatures Consensus

[Ira McDonald <[e-mail]>]

 Here are my responses:


   1. Should the WG work on PQ + T Hybrid Signatures for TLS?

Yes

   2. Should the WG only work on one: -pqt-dual-certs or -composite-ml-dsa?

Yes

   3. Should the WG work on: -pqt-dual-certs?

No

   4. Should the WG work on: -composite-ml-dsa?

Yes

Cheers,
- Ira

*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*
*Co-Chair - TCG Mobile Platform WG*








*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - ISTO Printer Working
GroupCo-Chair - ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF Designated
Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: [e-mail]
<[e-mail]>(permanent) PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*


On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 9:59 AM John Gray <John.Gray=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Thanks for starting this Sean.   Here are my responses:
>
>
>    1. Should the WG work on PQ + T Hybrid Signatures for TLS?
>
> Yes
>
>    2. Should the WG only work on one: -pqt-dual-certs or
>    -composite-ml-dsa?
>
> Yes
>
>    3. Should the WG work on: -pqt-dual-certs?
>
> No
>
>    4. Should the WG work on: -composite-ml-dsa?
>
> Yes
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> John Gray
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Sean Turner <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2026 12:52 PM
> *To:* TLS List <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Confirming PQ+T Signatures Consensus
>
> At IETF 126, the chairs conducted a series of polls [1] to determine the
> way forward for PQ+T hybrid signatures after hearing from the
> -composite-mldsa [2] and -pqt-dual-certs [3] authors; you can watch the
> setup, authors presentations, and
>
> At IETF 126, the chairs conducted a series of polls [1] to determine the way forward for PQ+T hybrid signatures after hearing from the -composite-mldsa [2] and -pqt-dual-certs [3] authors; you can watch the setup, authors presentations, and the polls at [4] from around 0:16:47 until 1:08:00. The polls' results showed in-room consensus to 1) work on PQ + T Signatures for TLS and 2) work only on -composite-mldsa. The chairs now need to confirm this consensus on list. We are going to do this by asking the four questions that follow. Please take note of the take note of the following:
>
> 1. Framing of the questions is found in this deck [5]; in case it is/was not clear a "Yes" on Question 1 implies WG adoption of a draft.
> 2. Again, a "Yes" for 3 or 4 implies you are in favor of adopting the associated draft as a working group item.
> 3. Based on the responses we got during the session we only asked the 1st 4 questions in [5].
>
> Please provide your answers to the following questions by 12 October 2026:
>
> 1. Should the WG work on PQ + T Hybrid Signatures for TLS?
> 2. Should the WG only work on one: -pqt-dual-certs or -composite-ml-dsa?
> 3. Should the WG work on: -pqt-dual-certs?
> 4. Should the WG work on: -composite-ml-dsa?
>
> Cheers,
> spt (for the chairs)
>
> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/polls-126-tls-202607241600/__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bVQxE_IIeIlpbl2kH6Zk91MKooWSVmf6rMlAXmw3oafVoeyu7y4Xmrj_FHTSeuh9wW4i7sY7ZJvo$
> [2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-tls-composite-mldsa/__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bVQxE_IIeIlpbl2kH6Zk91MKooWSVmf6rMlAXmw3oafVoeyu7y4Xmrj_FHTSeuh9wW4i7mH-U0Ta$
> [3] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yusef-tls-pqt-dual-certs/__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bVQxE_IIeIlpbl2kH6Zk91MKooWSVmf6rMlAXmw3oafVoeyu7y4Xmrj_FHTSeuh9wW4i7nGdVzw5$
> [4] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp1s1UMmhTI__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bVQxE_IIeIlpbl2kH6Zk91MKooWSVmf6rMlAXmw3oafVoeyu7y4Xmrj_FHTSeuh9wW4i7u3Q4dFq$
> [5] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/126/materials/slides-126-tls-framing-pq-t-signatures-for-tls-00__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!bVQxE_IIeIlpbl2kH6Zk91MKooWSVmf6rMlAXmw3oafVoeyu7y4Xmrj_FHTSeuh9wW4i7gHoQNDR$
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> *Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely
> for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this
> message has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or
> disclose of the information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately
> and delete the message from your system.*
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>