Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8B23A0CAA for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:48:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=Tv0fIZI1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=TvX7nDh5 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFriL7yBeWMI for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82DDB3A0CB0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 18:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6889874; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 21:48:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Jun 2020 21:48:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=Wv30ouTfce7+UxXSShG4IfDKbRsF za+NmwpxIaa4nm8=; b=Tv0fIZI17z1ix+gyqzsEH8tejjwv14IeA9WMmvQlBi8m SA07hFtDB8yuDZi5yAD9Hq3DdkcIe9LQzI8//LMFzo2pvVs5OgM/A1ZbvGFZc5UM 63h53qL35lp6E6Vj60whcAaAe7FIm3m0if+2XTT63FI8CB7MvZxCf9iasoDUm4X9 47Q1/jqIhiTRnNw/02aQqqHzlqkRsNdjloIYMbvBVt+sTimUrp56VUZcoGEbMAr4 NNBm6RAx9h5r1C5ugfOTPklrFC1f+We6nnrehC28e/YozS+RAd3mK4nIJSD/bKM0 rE0XuN7oGDnA+dBE9e5fQAZHlLgg/BNnZW0fXmgSOg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Wv30ou Tfce7+UxXSShG4IfDKbRsFza+NmwpxIaa4nm8=; b=TvX7nDh5OES4aWUr5V+VBp hfeWvARzoyXrn8vHLrRZ6+/n2QQRIBuxgBzfsUjQvS6tdOgwuakTseZDMZL8PPlp YLEss7AWCg6NzOh7LBxZNgQvTCT7x51lcItq7RFFHBb9l3lUhR5MDn1vN9VXMrGc KIPm0DN0IZFFznPBiC6cNMXyURk0Er957fg8QqPUBQsG2XBdJarkls0lL+Qh+wx/ xLM+NOWXxVp24ET0yu971vKdnh5uApEafILv+laKEaQY+EWKzrKo9278V9YbIcLn PL9U2W3INFqAsZbVfamdw9Qgf9c5jSeqPsTdkxdh33yIEQaotqCvxGOgVK4EJ5cA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudegtddggeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttd ertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhho figvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekteeuieektdekleefke evhfekffevvdevgfekgfeluefgvdejjeegffeigedtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvg ht X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id AD891E00C9; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 21:48:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-519-g0f677ba-fm-20200601.001-g0f677ba6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <8cfd2e2d-7df7-4054-ba15-c9bc33cdc034@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200604000011.387A5F4070F@rfc-editor.org> <73b5d3e2-d2f4-447c-84d6-0ae0a08374a9@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 11:47:38 +1000 From: "Martin Thomson" To: "'Eric Rescorla'" Cc: "" Content-Type: text/plain Archived-At: Subject: Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8446 (6204) X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 01:48:11 -0000 On Thu, Jun 4, 2020, at 11:44, Eric Rescorla wrote: > I think it would help to be more explicit here: > Servers which are authenticating with a resumption PSK MUST NOT send > the CertificateRequest message in the main handshake, [...], > Servers which are authenticating with an external PSK MUST NOT send the > CertificateRequest message either in the main handshake or in the > post-handshake phase. Future specifications MAY provide an extension to > permit this. That sounds great. I've a tiny tweak, but I will open an erratum with that suggestion.