Re: [TLS] padding bug
Kelly John Rose <iam@kjro.se> Tue, 24 September 2013 20:09 UTC
Return-Path: <iam@kjro.se>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4309B21F9C99 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FH4pFH+cjSvE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB8B21F9CC5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id un15so5048391pbc.15 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pgMODjZ74qoathmf/e+V/vbNH5Z2giADwPQSR0bsRqs=; b=Xd5eLmc4FMao9Ai6Hv+SC0gap11jLiNLw7U3+FDukbrQgKAjIplHOkeeUmiF+QbM5I 5RU5adfVdTDz/xlul4tE2qcdcNxkEjRYMHtmErqqEr4v5HhUxIGqXwdq67hCe99qWyDT gKtdDzMPF/BI4OdyMqS6vlPF35Gqr/K7GAILbtHKO3m7HC3vNdxiwbFnxESi3QExixEr 7IbdkNq8riFuPPgR4ZVwQEIVGlc12ikI3mjx8BCHtkDVZkeE1rqkGFSb3EaW2+wrKKUA Ye/f5w9iboQJ2WlKdxoXuqxVjXrwo3Z3EjhpFaBnFqoU3CDZMEs3FQnMYEKDiw30O4X/ ucpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6bCRKDlwyt/766ZdMRFJBpOh8CDQ85eXk2c8ThH24+tix5//Z+tQswuwLw34j+VkYAwHC
X-Received: by 10.66.163.199 with SMTP id yk7mr12960707pab.136.1380053357266; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.105] ([66.18.212.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fl3sm47801012pad.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5241F16B.5060200@kjro.se>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:09:15 -0400
From: Kelly John Rose <iam@kjro.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73556760B8@uxcn10-6.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <52411e4b.8712cd0a.074a.fffff2c8@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <52411e4b.8712cd0a.074a.fffff2c8@mx.google.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
OpenPGP: id=00468DE1; url=https://kjro.se/iamkjrose.gpg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [TLS] padding bug
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 20:09:33 -0000
If I may be permitted to vote, I would say A. On 24/09/2013 1:08 AM, Christian Kahlo wrote: >> Could people please indicate on the list whether they'd prefer option >> (A), fix the problem with EtM, or option (B), which appears to be "do >> nothing", or at least "delay indefinitely", which amounts to the same >> thing. > [X] A > > -Christian > -- Kelly John Rose Mississauga, ON Phone: +1 647 638-4104 Twitter: @kjrose Document contents are confidential between original recipients and sender.
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Hugo Krawczyk
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Bodo Moeller
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Michael D'Errico
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Christian Kahlo
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Hovav Shacham
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Blumenthal, Uri - 0558 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Ben Laurie
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Kelly John Rose
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Lewis, Nick
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Alfredo Pironti
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] padding bug Peter Gutmann