IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-extractor (Keying MaterialExporters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard

"Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> Fri, 24 July 2009 04:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB39B28C126; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqmMyY5wvy0e; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2423A68DB; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=RyrWEG7GXNw6lxPyrwpF4C3PuWLYpAhKPkJLEBN0XXZVwZMSt3OqhhktG2482TJi; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:X-Mailer:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [4.227.98.214] (helo=ix.netcom.com) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>) id 1MUBJP-0006tM-Bk; Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:19:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4A69282D.DA170554@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:19:09 -0700
From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Organization: IDNS and Spokesman for INEGroup
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rms@gnu.org
References: <026364d64021d6cef8b930cf16df1221.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0907201645020.16218-100000@citation2.av8.net> <20090721195028.GQ1020@Sun.COM> <E1MTkBi-0007Gi-5e@fencepost.gnu.org> <20090722223622.GP1020@Sun.COM> <E1MU9jO-0007UF-Sl@fencepost.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: c8e3929e1e9c87a874cfc7ce3b1ad11381c87f5e51960688ae446c6598bc85ca98ef0fd5f4e64007350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 4.227.98.214
Cc: ietf-honest@lists.iadl.org, tls@ietf.org, Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-extractor (Keying MaterialExporters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:44:14 -0000

Richard and all,

  I agree largely.  Very little software warrents patenting.  Protection
of any authors software can much better and easily be done in other
ways.  Open source is not the total answer either as some types of
software in open source format would be ill advised.

Richard Stallman wrote:

>     The operative word here is uncertainty.  A patent-holder creates
>     uncertainty.  How should an SDO respond?  I'm not sure.  I'm only sure
>     that I don't like getting DoSed, either into dropping a standard or into
>     not implementing it for fear of infringing.
>
> That's the nature of software patents: each one denies people the
> freedom to write and run certain kinds of software.  This is why we
> must abolish software patents.
>
> Until we succeed in doing that, we can resist in certain ways.  One of
> them is to refuse to establish standards that encourage their use.
>
> Generally speaking, standards are useful, because they enable people
> to converge what they are doing.  But that ceases to be true when the
> use of the standard is patented.  It is better to have no standard
> than have a standard that invites people into danger.
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!"  Barack ( Berry ) Obama

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email