Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-04

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Fri, 07 July 2017 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF1512EC05 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-lNm78QlNYm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D576126C83 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v67IktTp032396; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 19:51:06 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type; s=jan2016.eng; bh=CMS0wCk+nOMihL6iuVFbUCQDIP9BRtcqgfn2v91kn/0=; b=oauoPpHiQtNDCNSjWhO5fCz+lS4pAxhXGeSBPbnSqrnb6JnCaVdGzQphF5spU3dxILV9 2fWItdo1RbvHCg25irUeFizyzmSOyFQtPyRWxUXrZ3DTzihj8eJ3V1jHaZ8DnzO2Bhlm dzHitUWMeA1M3odVsg2lwz835madFcuTYZEtnX21fJLA+vhDBzWGAhqZXpatGwT6A5O2 M2g1K+YxjRwSNV3lL0HVH1VdMGEg3h7lw922OcM9RZpNERsipLh+kCXdI+hcauVaQ7pf arWaXFxt4/xEKag5x26pKn2UBFc8bfS4HdWKyvMCSOz6gQvtQ1rRwYZQmb7CAA9rFY6O Hg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (a184-51-33-18.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2bj21kayqa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Jul 2017 19:51:06 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v67IofRM001826; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:51:04 -0400
Received: from prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com ([172.27.118.251]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2be72ugk2u-1; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:51:04 -0400
Received: from [172.19.17.86] (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay10.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA6C1FC86; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:51:04 +0000 (GMT)
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
References: <CAOgPGoAcuFF5v8f5LWpYQtgE8WygA+n1fsg0AeVFJX1=cADUgw@mail.gmail.com> <e85e25dc-cad4-9339-87bc-9491e13ce398@akamai.com> <CAHPuVdU90P9tJ1h03btpj=aDt0OORYhMHB0o4wCAZwo3isn1oA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <f341c22f-a4df-433d-ac2a-71e19934f681@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:51:03 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdU90P9tJ1h03btpj=aDt0OORYhMHB0o4wCAZwo3isn1oA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1C4B8BB6721EAD0AC46E0D6C"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-07_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707070312
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-07_09:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707070311
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/bXqXdaSwT05MTn6w5ovS9KTjFFc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension-04
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 18:51:09 -0000

On 07/07/2017 01:31 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
> I'm not suggesting that we need to come up with a solution for this,
> but I believe the issue probably needs some sort of mention somewhere
> (in Security Considerations?).

Sounds good to me.

-Ben