Re: [TLS] Request for Review: Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 28 September 2010 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3CA3A6B34 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtuTwUaKu5LC for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29303A6BBB for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from moveme.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47800400EE for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:44:42 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4CA26081.5060702@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:39:13 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 Thunderbird/3.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <AANLkTik0hgkwm7RRt46Q9GudvzLhd1J8CZee=N3CSJK3@mail.gmail.com> <8739stpo35.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <AANLkTimAneCo-D2j8QxRGB0mNa7K4o_HG4g=ZrCFOyh0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimAneCo-D2j8QxRGB0mNa7K4o_HG4g=ZrCFOyh0@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [TLS] Request for Review: Default Port for IRC via TLS/SSL
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:38:38 -0000

On 9/28/10 3:37 PM, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:14, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:
> 
>> It looks good to me, but I think it ought to be on the Standards Track
>> rather than just Informational.
> 
> Thanks. :)
> 
> If there is a consensus that it would make sense to "upgrade" my I-D,
> I don't mind going that route. In case it isn't obvious, I am new to this
> and while I try to do my best & go through all documentation, I am
> very glad to receive advice.
> 
> 
>> I'm not sure this is something that is in scope for the TLS WG though,
>> it seems like an Apps Area document to me.
> 
> I will contact them and ask for their opinion.

I've already forwarded the I-D announcement about this spec to the
apps-discuss list:

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/admin/apps-discuss

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/