Re: [TLS] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-01

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 20 August 2013 15:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61F821F9C47 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILsgPKTHtbXZ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1769021F9C17 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7KFZZjJ013912; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:35:35 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {52138CC7-1E-1B221DC2-1FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.105]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.223]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:35:35 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-01
Thread-Index: AQHOnQaCdJJT7vp320qHp0flMWqEHJmc+GSAgABuHQCAALk1oP//4LWAgAAzexD//9WfgA==
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:35:35 +0000
Message-ID: <DC1962A7-F79E-4F54-BE16-11A1AF6E1AAB@checkpoint.com>
References: <CABkgnnXUwLQnVNt19Advb3s7ZGoc_Mrmr7AodigxZKyEZmPYwg@mail.gmail.com> <3651ef9088a147dd8e8d887f769a9538@BL2PR03MB194.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <7F46F059-63FA-4ABB-9176-68345DA5398B@checkpoint.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711CDF869DC@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <481A01D8-58EC-4D96-B195-0E5413BE10A4@checkpoint.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711CDF86A56@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C711CDF86A56@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [91.90.139.159]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 112249b47b22e48052a647d90cf8b3ae198f74389f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <BC2E4506B7EE1940860FC4A314D6D975@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-tls-applayerprotoneg-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:35:55 -0000

On Aug 20, 2013, at 6:08 PM, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

>> Makes no difference if it's in the registry, or if the IANA Considerations section says "IANA is requested to allocate the string "HTTP/2.0" for the specification in this document"
> 
> Well since it makes no difference to you, and since it does seem to make a difference to the HTTP-WG, and since we can avoid a potential problem by doing it this way, then we should just leave it to the HTTP-WG to do the request.

Sure. But that will not stop implementers from using the label based on the IANA Considerations section in the draft (when it's in last call and all)