Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 01 February 2020 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6BA1200A1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:37:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1mifRaSGtE6s for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd43.google.com (mail-io1-xd43.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3B98120024 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd43.google.com with SMTP id c16so10508688ioh.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:37:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v8i0EKzroxMVr6QBG4CPwaPlsnK8fgb8oVHw7jtd7Yw=; b=L2NbjgercaqN0QyFaAhAhksQwrHR8KNwQvgqjaapESgYRAlGfL1xiRFOcYvAB18gFF XdJy45+I0JZz0ewi4P0LWEcFFz0pV2dGonbKBGFCpRIl8bUaelajzPJb0rQnJCbd8M29 dVyt5XA5BWtM7TYPBXx1NWtxxfR8ZS7IrTpWe8k6WkKhWO84lXQRgIe7OkK0lMRTcaZ5 rZnLiQLWCgrz9nXBb0FzqR4/AzDSeMjA9jcbdnpHNsurkctinC2tMtpoaM6ENIbKHzQW YbJ/plb9e4eHdKf/I6+b82crhr1s+RQ6ncTK9Ii24odway3k0+ir3CbqdD2wbkUBhYTS HSog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v8i0EKzroxMVr6QBG4CPwaPlsnK8fgb8oVHw7jtd7Yw=; b=XQAjMvA5JwShlYYwDpe6qLaEvz3dImJO9TOdGBI0ZdUY5adQN8ZjKYwp/hsAcQ/uQh Go4h8r/BIn0tneIGeLyjf5aRm/zYcsvfLI2JWoFzFZMz/4tOk/HNq1vaMEN6yE6l3NkZ 3tfVVlEaNz/ybNLtVjY1tZDJnDxWw7L/+m1WpQ6/3ips+AkYEMMyYCi5JzzsJInXI7qn tkE9Opu/BnQjEt4xK0uF/sg+X/4yuOlaoEvI0viaCr/D1VyhD/886gEoe3ajyKE2S4rK ZodmKzmAygNE9/e9baR9bZOWldszmsqsBGe1rwAl06wPNAZQZ9HdPzuCChxg7NNz2/vh bgRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVdJz6uWZp+Uv03dndiUtxDE9UMkrfbhTnJ+TnO+SzBPW4J1NM1 KknrpXAByAv2CKtxOxALN+O+bu06yJ6xkw8y8VqpotdHydQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzx3b/tNo/CEwKCA2nnBlc59lBTedw/h1cr0U2ejWE5tpAxLWB2vieKqAnPZJI+2MUln22edLyFv7wFk37l/6o=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:21a:: with SMTP id e26mr11203727jaq.53.1580524621143; Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:37:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN2QdAH7t4fPgBfBSO7Ni1As2bVB9QvCw1s9j0ggqvTRUATE8A@mail.gmail.com> <20200123021455.GA73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <87427017-551e-4633-a0d3-75f378879aa9@redhat.com> <20200123124055.GF73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <CACsn0cngxBQTB+Pfw6t_+qsSFb0Kf8mV1U1J1UTsPJiUk=vg0w@mail.gmail.com> <20200123193250.GD12073@localhost> <20200123210151.GG73491@straasha.imrryr.org> <5F5F670C-A0BD-4F38-BEFF-192C171EDAC1@apple.com> <20200131235533.GA18021@localhost> <CAChr6Sz6PEgQUQg8dB9Ym0z5_iRjmZE5g1hUCCgEOsA-7A=P-w@mail.gmail.com> <20200201011115.GB18021@localhost> <CAChr6SywucrTUsAeN6Aw26ufmhcB8txAmFVNGnUaeR3gG653VQ@mail.gmail.com> <B3DA86FC-0897-46B4-B97C-D606755843BD@akamai.com> <CAChr6SwO0-pyqBLwthT_8iDXHzbKe2S+AeCvqYud5ox77m2J3g@mail.gmail.com> <7AAEE7D7-5FB1-40EE-9A92-C36D526D3ABB@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AAEE7D7-5FB1-40EE-9A92-C36D526D3ABB@akamai.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 18:36:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SzSU7tNnMkqGYZ-EK-AuVT+BTi=_2vhEwz_FyBTd5zVtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009a228c059d7a9021"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/bt4oqxFAoILfO8CNc0qL30EFROY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 02:37:04 -0000

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 6:30 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:

> *>*Not sure "several" is the correct term. There are some mailing list
> messages about the topic.
>
>
>
> A few people who are heavily involved in this WG have agreed this is an
> issue, and a few people aren’t.  Shrug.  As Nico said, time for a consensus
> call or more likely a discussion in Vancouver.
>

Sounds important.



> I think I’m done adding useful content to this thread.
>

Agree.

thanks,
Rob