Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, timing attacks in general, and what we can do in TLS
Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com> Fri, 15 December 2017 18:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918B1126E3A
for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:49:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id WnM6MNpEQBun for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from welho-filter1.welho.com (welho-filter1.welho.com [83.102.41.23])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AA1124BAC
for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by welho-filter1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD68D53726;
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:49:54 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at pp.htv.fi
Received: from welho-smtp1.welho.com ([IPv6:::ffff:83.102.41.84])
by localhost (welho-filter1.welho.com [::ffff:83.102.41.23]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
with ESMTP id Dzdf8OPzqqR0; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:49:54 +0200 (EET)
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII (87-92-19-27.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.92.19.27])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by welho-smtp1.welho.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5911928B;
Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:49:51 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 20:49:51 +0200
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>
To: Andrei Popov <Andrei.Popov@microsoft.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20171215184951.GB17780@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <20171215020116.04f9ae15@pc1>
<CAAF6GDe79w9XH1GrGvvR-+=uEKfi6GczacUX3Jhy0dL_zW67-Q@mail.gmail.com>
<20171215143057.GA17121@LK-Perkele-VII>
<MWHPR21MB01897F29048C1B2AB66EA7488C0B0@MWHPR21MB0189.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
<20171215174628.GA17601@LK-Perkele-VII>
<CABcZeBOsL0a0xHvVWEus_EY3mUNioaV9fsz89Gt+HeqdHpoyDw@mail.gmail.com>
<CACsn0ckYPpp5nD2jj4Zmx=ZJvqWzHW0tmmXo-9JeKL45+pRUqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABcZeBPPozOsTxxJO63RmHwTr56Wucx6OYW=kvvhosRUHR1ctA@mail.gmail.com>
<20171215183424.GA17780@LK-Perkele-VII>
<MWHPR21MB01893A20A8D0812E880926568C0B0@MWHPR21MB0189.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR21MB01893A20A8D0812E880926568C0B0@MWHPR21MB0189.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: ilariliusvaara@welho.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/bzHr_RklJMcXfxosV4VYetOvRG8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks,
timing attacks in general, and what we can do in TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working
group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>,
<mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:49:58 -0000
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 06:41:06PM +0000, Andrei Popov wrote: > It's true, the migration will be slow, but IMHO it still makes sense > to define and implement an alternative hash. Agreed. However, on certificates front, we need a method to perform backward-compatible algorithm transition. Because non-backward- compatible ones are just too hard. As we have seen _twice_. On TLS handshake hashes, the transitions are already backward- compatible. But that does not mean the transition will be easy. -Ilari
- [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, timing … Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Hanno Böck
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Hanno Böck
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Tim Hollebeek
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Andrei Popov
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Tim Hollebeek
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Martin Rex
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Colm MacCárthaigh
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] A closer look at ROBOT, BB Attacks, tim… Colm MacCárthaigh