[TLS] Was the numbering of rsa_pss_pss_sha384 intentional?
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 04 January 2018 01:05 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE6812D7F7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:05:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x08LjwcoMrv9 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:04:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x235.google.com (mail-ot0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6AA12D7F3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:04:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x235.google.com with SMTP id q5so141732oth.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:04:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4yC3cmuDXyzB3+ljdqWc2DuXsMK2QpHK70RxdKYWzFI=; b=bRnjsqgyVlcjSAcptnvd6Ek50gCF4Af6pzXswrILUD41NJI0dldOXUWl1lmX+KZwlt SEnw1WrACaDDxqbXqGzRUx7XhW0ZX0Jq52UMhpxiEagSAINX6RrBEDoqLetc+ni40UJo S7r2QuuwsnV+ZC/qeYzXajsM5+BNFp4k3G0sDagsHBnsOxWXuia/biqJQRUE1oUy4EOp 4FgkVYQBMxeS4bGirDkKk5VwNuYG2paIz9OdlUGd+IfdVfgiildy0PEhLCxOjk/6PjC9 NYgjuJ9CeT4kT/OMjj+ZoIDLuXhrna1bs1N6dWNTzkTN7zr0jBCpQ91sNnZMZSBhuVOH r+qA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4yC3cmuDXyzB3+ljdqWc2DuXsMK2QpHK70RxdKYWzFI=; b=YO8/r3IAhkor0CUti9m8NhADRmN43o7NHIfVf6Eq2/0gEBXe4/us7BySnvrcwJs2i9 +7jqagTA2rOeEL6eUZIoS0gn0DrD74PcNga3XFxQIPr3OnNgpClL2naBpk+DWCrxKP5/ uz+VWE0gFksASFHODdY4C9wJ71tOqdQdh8In/m/SPsmGCzgeqmQlQoDgLzstHuCJ4kb2 MO3ihkeBP3Dxkd4srpqBihliJ9guO4mNcnapW24k2xi4fBiwgnAlcfJscIANbOrNee80 8+KaHy70rHGcvxvaIwqi+lk3sfTf4aXB+87tSkuKfzdS+UFGKy0SnLNicFglMyzPPV5J mXSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mINiLIOvRp3Pt0oAlhd0f/Z8psi6fSp25mFroVQxAhMRxUXll2v l/y2GvcFKMZar5f+YwPCWeSm3561L47A/7VepCo9Xc15
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouPVc0uKgVyou5Upg/056O7H4/pM7crvspmfYybWgKmL6oSanwuo0uRsKoog48OztNRo/xN7uOzNvYwatawybk=
X-Received: by 10.157.74.52 with SMTP id h49mr1894249otf.308.1515027898065; Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:04:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.46.182 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:04:57 -0800 (PST)
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:04:57 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUT4TGekD83fB5e4Z10RPj4-Pmv=_tppCWcUEM0=N8MrQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/c4uLgl3dgnp7VyoTdmWcdFPF-yM>
Subject: [TLS] Was the numbering of rsa_pss_pss_sha384 intentional?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 01:05:01 -0000
rsa_pss_pss_sha256(0x0809), rsa_pss_pss_sha384(0x0810), rsa_pss_pss_sha512(0x0811), 0x080a is the next value...
- [TLS] Was the numbering of rsa_pss_pss_sha384 int… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Was the numbering of rsa_pss_pss_sha384… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Was the numbering of rsa_pss_pss_sha384… Martin Thomson