[TLS] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-09: (with COMMENT)

[Deirdre Connolly <[e-mail]>]

Thank you for your review, I think all of these comments are addressed by
version 10: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/10/

On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 3:37 PM Mike Bishop via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-mlkem/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> # IESG review of draft-ietf-tls-mlkem-09
>
> CC @MikeBishop
>
> ## Nits
>
> ### Misnamed references
>
> The text uses `[DUALEC-TLS]`, but the reference is `[DUALECTLS]`. Please
> align these.
>
> ### Outdated references
>
> Document references `draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design`, but that has been
> published
> as `RFC9954`.
>
> Document references `draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-mlkem`, but that has been
> published
> as `RFC10024`.
>
> ## Notes
>
> This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF]. You can use
> the
> [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into
> individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT].
>
> [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md
> [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments
> [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool
>
>
>
>