Re: [TLS] how close are we?

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Wed, 12 October 2016 03:21 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE671296C6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=auckland.ac.nz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BsTDCodZhDHo for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224DE1296C3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1476242488; x=1507778488; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=nRoXPcJLKA+W+Qp66uyi66O/t2EjXWU3bb0TFBrBN/g=; b=l0+jhOz2polGK1XW/V3cNNqUNS8T8QJyoZjUfDOvfGQlrTsakSco42VW wRlnR+GVLfxKxe1UwAP+WY+AF4Jq3N6YGO7ZVqihgD0FSNTWcISJnxxvK CZEhCUwad2x2E1hWOhhdco6fA1NcVlTmW4+auxgH/fJPwzz+TwN9pT0PP 9BztNY6IK1v8pEA+qLxnx0f52O0fi/UwnBivK2wRz9INj+ddaUT04GNaQ ac5jVWT7dsAFrM1R/Phcc41bU3YkOhEbz2K4WU0z+iSY9LNfgKyvk9TcR CcxZHdlwnzMjVOMvHlXKUIhqNmGzwttAUCfTCwHsI47/9H0QUKZQIJ8h2 A==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,332,1473076800"; d="scan'208";a="109817061"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 10.6.2.2 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-a.uoa.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.2]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 12 Oct 2016 16:21:22 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.2.5) by uxcn13-ogg-a.UoA.auckland.ac.nz (10.6.2.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:21:23 +1300
Received: from uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.25]) by uxcn13-ogg-d.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([10.6.2.25]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 16:21:23 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Xiaoyin Liu <xiaoyin.l@outlook.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: how close are we?
Thread-Index: AdIkL02YcVjui0A+SGmVotYm/TlkOAAAMiseAAHY320=
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 03:21:23 +0000
Message-ID: <1476242482704.52897@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <5c8856d676684aa189919fb1c59bfdb8@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>, <CY1PR15MB07781839CDE058F110E6F95DFFDD0@CY1PR15MB0778.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR15MB07781839CDE058F110E6F95DFFDD0@CY1PR15MB0778.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/cKqCYg-cycR7nmAeGKZi4C-43Bc>
Subject: Re: [TLS] how close are we?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 03:21:33 -0000

Xiaoyin Liu <xiaoyin.l@outlook.com>; writes:

>Not directly related to Rich's question, but will we settle the "TLS 1.3 -> TLS 2.0" 
>discussion (PR #612) before WGLC? Or has this already been closed as "keeping 
>the current name"?

The impression I got from the discussion was that most people, or at least those who
contributed, wanted 2.0, or at least something other than 1.3.  I was kinda surprised 
to see it still being referred to as 1.3.

Peter.