[TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 14 April 2025 04:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AE51B8CCA6 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oGGdWeJJoZcu for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 453F01B8CCA1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c559b3eb0bso167446285a.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; t=1744603356; x=1745208156; darn=ietf.org; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vKs6ZqLxl5uzV+Om8g8Rl6a/MRdWiE675IZ6r5BWnMs=; b=XnHqoNyZN0iJPR+aRExI0RCoRg7vwcLs8kiCLzTQDs7y7/r2elUrcRrA35Jf39rxqD /40T9kjaugMNOgdJj5XrUiqxKdmRDlcawPbwLxUFpG1OTpZL3YysBuQ/aO5BIGKeSbBI Guwmq1znaun1ePZXxJOOf+iGcKM2SvuT37KXM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1744603356; x=1745208156; h=message-id:in-reply-to:to:references:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vKs6ZqLxl5uzV+Om8g8Rl6a/MRdWiE675IZ6r5BWnMs=; b=ZSuuiT2mLc8YKXDKPnsX092UthBcpITr3IrNJiYbZwUVDG+tI2P/+01YYstWyC5vN6 1Sd24EfSrm/52fCRJl7aUuE+WCQ92sRtNiFd8zpIel8sH48EHZuhrBhlkeoT31ND0oUB UY4GqirA5em5IvgVFan/dfErNC12mqKZ1orazxIw18FQ0+TNkPe4ZZ5TkQbZpqvzFnp2 dKqbJGKW8rwCJsdkomQL8t7MMLJlRIQMXDRXaZGzRPwmyE7HidvFFt4Poh1iI7PotPsW n6pefoctejJR+D6o92Ykjp7Lftbt7YBpyxjoXcgghrWS7YsGmluVG8HuyjCYTpFjO9ve 8Ytw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzHzLfs3l3DJeAkcQIrG1xxUysHH8SMWeZLyvdp/K65tNGbQd9/ jk2m9SVMNjswJfV/SbwTAzFacGj9avtNE89eVZou+GZ8peNVybUXGfbVMVIxoaeXjMeApFictgx t
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct4A9+HzZ/QH97mr0MpDvkPxdKnarRvFW4gnBgOgbcugHyp0tzWyhvlyfcqTkk WoTSRzLRlelyJTJq5Ea4aVZIBoaWZuQHDfs74VOa/VVEtuGlL/0ZfQjqmHtXAoZ37BQvvLPMp05 1sMrJX3VLldAkdNKxTBkbIdMiJ0vqg6igOkQ8rmIUGgKM37UzuudRy3l5c3yL7oJytXqD0k1DWv xuw9FVBkePZ/cOtGM9T34ky3o8jGUhRsyGVAXYk8lVb3xeyp1lYuJHoq0cUoLVvPi7COTS94vF8 C/t7uNeaLFYKXWOC3qRtbiK93Yf49gk+rwzwoj53Z+HUcjfzCK+JKlEmkYqN5uXdITxy0XV5Ew= =
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGAsLdpr4UobtVLM/jiwnoDFcAcXd3L5TaP+fAuvii3B1XS+yqIWaoSTN+kGUjAgbW2yesPWg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2489:b0:7c7:a604:d432 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c7af0dd2e3mr1766574785a.30.1744603356372; Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:4040:252a:8d00:3d03:4417:a781:6af8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-7c7a8951727sm667388085a.41.2025.04.13.21.02.35 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Apr 2025 21:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.500.181.1.5\))
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:02:15 -0400
References: <582917A1-F936-4A15-AE9D-342076605BE7@sn3rd.com>
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <582917A1-F936-4A15-AE9D-342076605BE7@sn3rd.com>
Message-Id: <F347DA21-EB06-4FBF-B357-871A0FFA8DB1@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.500.181.1.5)
Message-ID-Hash: 6744XYK3WMRPD5YXGGKQVIYDP7WRRSLM
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6744XYK3WMRPD5YXGGKQVIYDP7WRRSLM
X-MailFrom: sean@sn3rd.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: WG Adoption Call for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ciwln0PyEBIyD3kZuerrpqAji94>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Just a reminder that this WG adoption call closes tomorrow.

Cheers,
spt

> On Apr 1, 2025, at 8:58 AM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> We are continuing with our pre-announced tranche of WG adoption calls; see [0] for more information. This time we are issuing a WG adoption call for the ML-KEM Post-Quantum Key Agreement for TLS 1.3 I-D [1]. If you support adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this draft, please send a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close at 2359 UTC on 15 April 2025.
> 
> In response to other WG adoption calls, Dan Bernstein pointed out some potential IPR (see [2]), but no IPR disclosure has been made in accordance with BCP 79.  Additional information is provided here; see [3].
> 
> BCP 79 makes this important point:
> 
>  (b) The IETF, following normal processes, can decide to use
>    technology for which IPR disclosures have been made if it decides
>    that such a use is warranted.
> 
> WG members can take this information into account during this adoption call to determine if we should adopt these drafts.
> 
> Reminder:  This call for adoption has nothing to do with picking the mandatory-to-implement cipher suites in TLS.
> 
> Cheers,
> Joe and Sean
> 
> [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KMOTm_lE5OIAKG8_chDlRKuav7c/
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-tls-mlkem-key-agreement/
> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/mt4_p95NZv8duZIJvJPdZV90-ZU/
> [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GKFhHfBeCgf8hQQvhUcyOJ6M-kI/
>