IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] AES-OCB in TLS [New Version Notification for draft-zauner-tls-aes-ocb-03.txt]

Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> Thu, 06 August 2015 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <azet@azet.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F07A1B39A0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLhA8WvpGwOk for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591AA1B399E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgj17 with SMTP id gj17so7629181wic.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=ZzY/AGnHWLqDCJyyplJynh5+UihlMnd3+jSeIVtYOqI=; b=XF4aCWjXSI9CrNIxPl9L8LTocnr1WvXAh4BgZnD6+ngDKgNXukTN1LMgqYN++a3yk3 iOKyFmxU+HwKwZ6IVvFPEtZtv1cXJkFEqiEfOvRYL6FmfRMT4ddcaozYmDb2HaLNIRfc kguZh0RBKgrV7Rul+zdYOkbai/XmkkaqQTy0fU0J4mU53b+pcEUxhg9fRE0PYbQ1ww7f n9p/wMqk6whhMk5BS8V4ZWzE9sqXhqZEUqXv3MCAF5ohiE6wjaeRVGprXU/9gY8VWJRO v/3AoKhxfebd7XdygRvwxenTCur6ZugaNc3/w94m476/SW19FReWtvgjvp3eCPo36zf5 c5Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkl3omu7C4kr7tkTEbJNm5BdsvCqCVtpO5pOoz5fZZOyyjVfgwxtqxv4/KRbT3+tzohd48u
X-Received: by 10.194.171.129 with SMTP id au1mr29180433wjc.115.1438838968109; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from typhoon.azet.org (chello080108032135.14.11.univie.teleweb.at. [80.108.32.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id eu2sm1270106wic.8.2015.08.05.22.29.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 07:29:25 +0200
From: Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org>
To: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <20150806052924.GA7196@typhoon.azet.org>
References: <20150805223709.17788996.37225.15481@ll.mit.edu> <55C292A1.8080909@azet.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55C292A1.8080909@azet.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/crwK4LwpmO3HkehgH5KJ8FOe7FA>
Cc: TLS Mailing List <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] AES-OCB in TLS [New Version Notification for draft-zauner-tls-aes-ocb-03.txt]
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 05:29:31 -0000

PS:

* Aaron Zauner <azet@azet.org> [06/08/2015 00:48:03] wrote:
> I've written to Gligor and Donescu (his mail address is bouncing though
> and I do not have another/current one). I've not received any replies as
> of today. Rogaway, like myself, is not sure if that patent actually
> relates to OCB. He's included it in his initial IPR statement on RFC
> 7253 [0] as a pre caution as far as I can tell. The patent by Gligor and
> Donescu will expire on 18th of January 2021.

FYI: It's only been 1.5w since I've written to them (holiday high
season as well). Jutla now also reached out. Let's see how this
goes. I'm optimistic.

Aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email