Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Mon, 06 May 2019 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2326E120233 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqId52Z4tsTv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B1F12022B for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DBE7446C9D; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:41:41 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 14:41:41 -0400
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20190506184141.GL67454@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
References: <28511b10-8f6a-4394-95a9-5188130f7b58@www.fastmail.com> <20190503172022.GH4464@akamai.com> <1556904629782.23087@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <16747558.couhpb2nsq@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <785E42E7-83FB-411F-8726-989CC8B734BC@ll.mit.edu> <CAHbuEH65=xJJr4dK=UJBMgaWFZ8h8jwtLt+Nb-jGHYB_RsjcHQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH65=xJJr4dK=UJBMgaWFZ8h8jwtLt+Nb-jGHYB_RsjcHQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/cs3JQL1NSoYP9c4A4t3wgEQeS5I>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC for "Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1"
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 18:41:57 -0000

On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:50:42PM -0400, Kathleen Moriarty wrote:

> Is this better suited for another (short) draft?

SHA-1 certificates are history now.  If we're raising the floor,
it should IMHO be safe to deprecate the MD5 and SHA-1 signature
algorithms from TLS 1.2.

Does anyone have evidence of medium to long-term requirements for
continued SHA-1 sigalg support?

-- 
	Viktor.