IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 02 March 2021 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71963A0FB6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:35:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=PzVGiL4O; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=AYVQrLqY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ePSDONP3_7za for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F1F93A0AA7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE051C for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:35:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Mar 2021 16:35:36 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=GtIdk07FFfh3P6YphTzmgqtZKteL0s6 JRkzVEAh3WeY=; b=PzVGiL4OWysRdWl0tbuKa15aLxJGxZILgNKnWS18B1J4Dc0 sSfcWa4mP+MjU7Nqqz2tbJ85xCInojJNdWzTSwEN0k8zL/l7thRiu3KMl9PFu7mF 8nP0v87QFgJja4Py13LxH5UdP8aLodMBXSrBwKPanTHKTN1N4E3WyMhSIXdX8ALu P1rwOPOHObq/2stIsqdXe4NTDcZmXwISHMK8Ldujn25n90VSl9TXtS8lYO2odV0V pMcmh48rkMxx1ElRCnFIldQTKsWVksW+1b45LwXve1B7QbYOSFAax5ZrlGwANhvo yizT00F8fok4bTJG6Jzg8XK17Sgz8JZy0xrQ6iw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=GtIdk0 7FFfh3P6YphTzmgqtZKteL0s6JRkzVEAh3WeY=; b=AYVQrLqY58I16PsWXOnhL2 +Y8b8IHEsP+kuO74FEepNZEnZOZqLwvxPpV5CXATYcv6qgx+NQUVJdpxPC2kUfnC 4xgRTDAHx0bfQrytKB2YS1+BeQbyErhXJpiv6np0ZLcbnmhvljBc7ZDflPpJtJ+o E1Jezg+lmIu4IXXpojTmgQ/d7n7/dKwogD63OPBkiydZ9KjKMcZYhsAoOJmZqUgw pjdKSk9TJmr5yV9x/SuvFG8RIk9F0zWAd1exbJEaOfNTmo1m5ViScTIYL5Is0o0j RoTrnON0CQRL25dXxB4vDF0qUd7P4ReTPDUt5QV4UUrFLcl4Bo/jqnMmpiwfULKQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:p68-YON3k7j1SJJ7x_2fvqN-MX6-zLmvn38vPgDGaEj2pDh8dEuhbA> <xme:p68-YM8ZurthuzhXEPu8Tot0BvtxSLxZ1FzZ3vCbxZM6zKXM_sdhplYQLc6qcKZmj K7P5U6AQu-Tbfp1Hoc>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddttddgudegfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecuogfuuhhsphgvtghtffhomhgrihhnucdlgeelmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeutdduveekffeihfevteejveduudetfeekhfeutddvhffgtdeh ieetfeehffegueenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhgihhthhhusgdrihhone cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehl ohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:p68-YFRPoWUV-N2W0WDQt2M0dl2TIRKe_69c1qQ1Thj95qQXEaYrUw> <xmx:p68-YOuqR3EciJXeAj4p0LxiNWEC94l-ERjVc9GrJkIGZ9bp_6VmKw> <xmx:p68-YGes-jVrgYqqSqNmujJLYm3PQwRIBYQj2vbAfXj7fjFfBTxSYA> <xmx:p68-YArclz-aA-e5xD-YBlQJU3Z4fmcWKcBTOeUTpcAO2D4rdN77rw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4228A4E059F; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 16:35:35 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-206-g078a48fda5-fm-20210226.001-g078a48fd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <beb7113d-c063-41f2-91c1-f0c6bbff05ce@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8e41260d-6422-4dd3-82cc-b7aec9744613@www.fastmail.com>
References: <8e41260d-6422-4dd3-82cc-b7aec9744613@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 08:35:15 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/d1MsUHFPwNf_reF-fnBI2y0PaLE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 21:35:41 -0000

This should be fine.  Moving to HPKE-v1 will remove an awkward dependency problem now that we're starting to use HPKE for other things.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, at 05:07, Christopher Wood wrote:
> The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official 
> target for interop. The diff between this version and the current 
> editor's copy of the draft is below:
> 
>    
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt&url2=https://tlswg.github.io/draft-ietf-tls-esni/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt
> 
> Given the size of the diff, and the recent update to HPKE to prepare it 
> for IRSG review, I'd like to propose that we cut -10 (when the 
> datatracker opens) and use that as the new interop target. This will 
> resolve the moving HPKE target going forward and let that part of the 
> protocol stabilize.
> 
> What do other implementers think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris (no hat)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email