IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19

Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <hkario@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123CF129801 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 06:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e9ji6xnCbP_x for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 06:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503001297D0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 06:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F28E22BA29; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:40:44 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4F28E22BA29
Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hkario@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4F28E22BA29
Received: from pintsize.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-200-48.brq.redhat.com [10.40.200.48]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0407418A51; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:40:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:40:35 +0200
Message-ID: <2454705.8d2estPYRD@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <228B1CCF-088B-4F4C-B2FD-A20036B9224A@akamai.com>
References: <025D3ABD-199F-421A-9265-6F960135A3B7@sn3rd.com> <228B1CCF-088B-4F4C-B2FD-A20036B9224A@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4879030.lEqOSujmGg"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:40:44 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/d5eGZ_Nudv6gUhuTFQQkOBUKNr8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:49:13 -0000

On Tuesday, 28 March 2017 08:23:33 CEST Kaduk, Ben wrote:
> On 3/13/17, 12:30, "Sean Turner" <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> Do we want to add some commentary about the extant SHA1 collisions when we
> say that {rsa_pkcs1,dsa,ecdsa}_sha1 are only SHOULD NOT?
 
There still are non-insignificant number of Internet facing servers that 
require SHA-1 being advertised for connection to be successful.
SHOULD NOT is a good compromise for it.
-- 
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email