Re: [TLS] IANA considerations I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-dtls-heartbeat-01.txt

Michael Tüxen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Tue, 01 February 2011 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689843A6DEF for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:34:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.223, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BMaFIloZ0idk for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E543A7091 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 05:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.113] (p508FB1D6.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.177.214]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E081C0C0BED; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:37:40 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <00d001cbc1f4$dcc0e080$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:37:40 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FE1282DC-007D-469D-B482-A5ECFF2B1D8D@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <20110127114502.24680.73782.idtracker@localhost><874o8uplm4.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <09E8BE99-3D69-4693-99DF-2DDD9D48B52B@lurchi.franken.de> <00d001cbc1f4$dcc0e080$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
To: t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] IANA considerations I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-dtls-heartbeat-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:34:51 -0000

On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:28 AM, t.petch wrote:

> Michael
> 
> I think that the IANA considerations could do with more work.
> 
> Dropping 'Heartbeat Modes' and 'Heartbeat Message Types'
> into the IANA website could cause them to be lost for ever.  If they are
> specific  to (D)TLS, then I would want to see that in the title, or else
> have them subordinate to something that does.
We can name them "DTLS and TLS Heartbeat Modes" and
"DTLS and TLS Heartbeat Message Types" or "(D)TLS Heartbeat Modes"
and "(D)TLS Heartbeat Message Types", whatever you prefer. Any opinion?
> 
> Second, while I like starting with values with one, you leave zero 
> open for the next person to use!  I would suggest reserving 
> zero and 255 in both registries.
Good idea. Well do that in the next ref.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Tom Petch
>