[TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (5251)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 01 February 2018 13:59 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2EF12EADA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 05:59:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jy4q22od2PQi for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 05:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05D712EAC1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 05:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 77809B819EE; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 05:59:47 -0800 (PST)
To: agl@google.com, wtc@google.com, nmav@redhat.com, joachim@secworks.se, simon@josefsson.org, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, joe@salowey.net, sean+ietf@sn3rd.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: xavier.bonnetain@inria.fr, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20180201135947.77809B819EE@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 05:59:47 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/dBMIsLsaA7XevXpd9hzJ6skMqE4>
Subject: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (5251)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 13:59:49 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7905, "ChaCha20-Poly1305 Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5251 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Xavier Bonnetain <xavier.bonnetain@inria.fr> Section: 4. Security Original Text ------------- Poly1305 is designed to ensure that forged messages are rejected with a probability of 1-(n/2^107), where n is the maximum length of the input to Poly1305. In the case of (D)TLS, this means a maximum forgery probability of about 1 in 2^93. Corrected Text -------------- Poly1305 is designed to ensure that forged messages are rejected with a probability of 1-(n/2^106), where n is the maximum length of the input to Poly1305. In the case of (D)TLS, this means a maximum forgery probability of about 1 in 2^92. Notes ----- The security claimed on poly1305 is slightly beyond what was proven by the designer (see https://cr.yp.to/mac/poly1305-20050329.pdf), and the trivial forgery attempt with a message of length 1 succeeds with probability 2^{-106}. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7905 (draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04) -------------------------------------- Title : ChaCha20-Poly1305 Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Publication Date : June 2016 Author(s) : A. Langley, W. Chang, N. Mavrogiannopoulos, J. Strombergson, S. Josefsson Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (5251) RFC Errata System
- Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (52… Adam Langley
- Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (52… Xavier Bonnetain
- Re: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7905 (52… Adam Langley