Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.

Richard Moore <rich@kde.org> Fri, 04 March 2016 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <richmoore44@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8493E1A1EEE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:42:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VntJU8dY4YpE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:42:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5911C1A21A9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:42:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id h129so47369096ywb.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 07:42:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=yUW7q0RdqYd0yFtvA6YrUUpt9upevihHwQkcVdiDavQ=; b=YK8B+nTVF2+Zxf/9+7ObgGhJBE3XJgx0KORcr5mirHELLUp7ubh9w8WhbaYpTgpzjh /GczULv5PHAlLSyIWJb24YbzhjOhGYXfJEP8qCXaDOYYodBbq5gTy0K3fXvDgbo/HDnx O6RraXg7VlIm621GxhzCFqnlfMKJUUFW5FO/BnLnQC0wol0wJsN11OqtscokttIK+KeI 25sKvr98hAaa3XcwfWQfazV2sW8UpTUYPCcyMmFtYO/DciLEqN4zU+BcAwl3/4anFxvI QFp3ptq3GkJXjx785dQ37ZGoZqVeBO96vC8a03PKsy37FHE5tj5O2Os0L8GalUPnszx6 EzMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=yUW7q0RdqYd0yFtvA6YrUUpt9upevihHwQkcVdiDavQ=; b=OoIlPl5uz/qTtdI0vV20BkanXc8S04wCILLqBUxLEEdt3qS8GAXaDLDJxEqKqnBxxe ouoB1kN1ZRS4CP0vgQz2cHRRRgp7WqY+HzSDb1+OTkNMjgNpqMdpVRpTCap39A6PmlH+ HnJBbrshkO6sYyArOmpNSb1W6o33ZOZC9tplQYbjanX32bsjMaExlHpCgq8QJxxwfNTu OK7jeLno3q2V6uhzVR8Pl+J5paUsY5Mjm6sPeurAapp89NfXkSgr/xuP1LOQvNHvjbIa vHb4Cuv/VAEqtATsUwKh7wgrH7HfSrmRWKYZ8QTqB/X84cNlGHhj8nqoSrwhaY78pmuS JQqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJWrmLUtxpAzsjjma3+cP2RuyPxMjEE5+jDofVwJw+8+LjYokh0Ruk/q9n8lE3HvjgaGoIjaHIecYuNGg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.55.199 with SMTP id e190mr5077889ywa.55.1457106149654; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 07:42:29 -0800 (PST)
Sender: richmoore44@gmail.com
Received: by 10.37.4.139 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 07:42:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWf_W--LQixDBfSqeinQ01Ew4c-QXuSnyE-qN5ckrfCsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMfhd9WNHqfRH=M=_B7_apJ-r43fi8qoe-+VcDkrKPwwhkPR5A@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWd_4F-J5m8vtR2fNtKg+1sB=HVAr=w0CPT6W+31g_Kgg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMp7mVtwrF9CL-MqyF0UZJemBOMyFieAy++-_539fE5eAB_KMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnWf_W--LQixDBfSqeinQ01Ew4c-QXuSnyE-qN5ckrfCsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 15:42:29 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: QPrdENDQh8U6DZdynZD8D2auhCQ
Message-ID: <CAMp7mVsGGB4A1_3K=dh8tWBZs1KCg8MrAC7c+=om_MhzZ8dgZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Moore <rich@kde.org>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143fcc0734a0b052d3af61d
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/dTrQmmyPUxI-2DGTgErYKHxehHI>
Cc: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Accepting that other SNI name types will never work.
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 15:42:31 -0000

On 3 March 2016 at 23:16, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote
​:​

>
> I assume that the last
> error indicates that you didn't get an alert, which I find is
> alarmingly common in TLS.
>
>
​Yes, that's right.

Cheers

Rich.