Return-Path: X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134611A01F0 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:55:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LtS8yGZWKvGR for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:55:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0718.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:718]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6241C1A0195 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:55:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from BN3PR0301MB1252.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.207.28) by BN3PR0301MB0833.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.65.19; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:54:53 +0000 Received: from BN3PR0301MB1250.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.207.26) by BN3PR0301MB1252.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.161.207.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:54:52 +0000 Received: from BN3PR0301MB1250.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.207.26]) by BN3PR0301MB1250.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.207.26]) with mapi id 15.01.0059.007; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:54:52 +0000 From: Andrei Popov To: Sean Turner , "TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org)" Thread-Topic: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05 Thread-Index: AQHQN0MnOO68smN3ukGG1Zv1jxiD35zOG+TQ Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:54:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <3F4C76ED-4375-438F-ADC9-66E49A19574B@ieca.com> In-Reply-To: <3F4C76ED-4375-438F-ADC9-66E49A19574B@ieca.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ed31::2] authentication-results: ieca.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ieca.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=microsoft.com; x-dmarcaction-test: None x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(3005004); SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1252; UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1252; x-forefront-prvs: 0465429B7F x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(377454003)(164054003)(92566002)(33656002)(86362001)(62966003)(54606007)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(40100003)(122556002)(2900100001)(54206007)(76576001)(15975445007)(2950100001)(77156002)(86612001)(74316001)(46102003)(2656002)(87936001)(99286002)(230783001)(102836002)(107886001)(106116001)(19580395003)(19580405001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1252; H:BN3PR0301MB1250.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Jan 2015 19:54:52.5209 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0301MB1252 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0833; X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com Archived-At: Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05 X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:55:20 -0000 Good draft, we need strong DH groups, and a way to negotiate them is a usef= ul, too. One change I would suggest is to avoid special-form primes. Thanks, Andrei -----Original Message----- From: TLS [mailto:tls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sean Turner Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 11:31 AM To: TLS@ietf.org (tls@ietf.org) Subject: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05 This is the WGLC (working group last call) for draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff= -dhe-05: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-negotiated-ff-dhe-05/ Please send comments on this draft to the TLS list before February 16, 2015= . The chairs and our AD are curious about whether switching to use of "e" as = opposed to "pi", as RFC 3526 did, is an issue. The draft provides rational= e for the change, but Stephen asked about this particular point @ our Hawai= i session. spt _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls