IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Last Call: RFC 2818 (HTTP Over TLS) to Proposed Standard

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 01 June 2012 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB4711E80AD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.322, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZejpqbMz6y2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E997011E80A4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.102] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q51JGaCK096354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:16:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FC90EBD.1050803@ieca.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:16:36 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <38A40014-322F-4904-80E5-A48CF576DDB2@vpnc.org>
References: <20120601164205.25357.54620.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FC90EBD.1050803@ieca.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Last Call: RFC 2818 (HTTP Over TLS) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:16:40 -0000

On Jun 1, 2012, at 11:49 AM, Sean Turner wrote:

> So....I wasn't clear enough when I asked for this IETF LC.  I initiated this process as an AD not at the request of the WG.
> 
> My rationale was that it's in the downref registry and that there's 66 or so RFCs that refer to 2818 and a lot of them are normative.  If it ends up that folks prefer the 2818bis -> PS coupled with 2818 -> Historic.  I'd be all right with that too.

That seems the best way to go, given how much things have changed in the last decade.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status