Re: [TLS] AD review of draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 22 April 2013 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4B621E8053 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ltiuvO47EbW for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com [72.246.2.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5419121E8045 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1019CFCC5; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com [172.17.120.126]) by prod-mail-xrelay01.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAAFCFC8F; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ustx2ex-cashub.dfw01.corp.akamai.com (ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com [172.27.25.73]) by prod-mail-relay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BE1205D; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([169.254.2.178]) by ustx2ex-cashub7.dfw01.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.73]) with mapi; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:15:05 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Bert Greevenbosch <Bert.Greevenbosch@huawei.com>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:15:05 -0500
Thread-Topic: [TLS] AD review of draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey
Thread-Index: AQHOOqugRs5hBntoEky0lAT8pzuh/ZjhbddAgAD0/5A=
Message-ID: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7B311446B@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <516D5ADE.3050506@ieca.com> <46A1DF3F04371240B504290A071B4DB63D715C65@szxeml558-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <46A1DF3F04371240B504290A071B4DB63D715C65@szxeml558-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [TLS] AD review of draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:15:08 -0000

Yes, O*CS*P light is a bad name. :)

Have you looked at what SSH is doing for key management issues?

	/r$

--  
Principal Security Engineer
Akamai Technology
Cambridge, MA