Re: [TLS] IANA Considerations for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Wed, 26 June 2019 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C99E1203A8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RoG-vbSx5CM for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2700B1203A6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 131so3613246ljf.4 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D211I/v77rBpaAbL67CJX/pLc6cCaxP88K3pX2uAJEc=; b=ZSRGoAllqxoxG+WErJZlyZI8QO+hUeTTnSzQwx6oxewq6zm3nY1mGuv5kn25DmDhuY r4xiEV3cXz6XBbLjjhwbKDN7dQPMhTwY2JXzXYbHoHzAfRZyHzphHY+AABebqtTKxEcF /xEnazMTfinNRk6DGvXaBzg4786jZnB0HOw6Imbu0539q67t09HwkREq7JrqDpnCrrIm knWij/rKxP/jo3O+023b0cJ9UTeCesVjQ31mDbYzgFFBOG7qhCr30DM2+Yq2zMgak8hV 0Uj0ym7dEr6rCvajXdb2vywpPvgNvieX0dVfBlSsRac3NIw2J5EhEpjTh02J8kGTOI26 vOdw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D211I/v77rBpaAbL67CJX/pLc6cCaxP88K3pX2uAJEc=; b=ahGitKp+3g8rzSjbzCnmf9uwg/UEumsDMZssZuePgQ+TAcCkKxTCCSQn9Sbid0HOKT kIAuNJiPEfWsZ6ZqMGhr5zLx9WI0xnEXc4JDhXTW3OBuN2my51rGnQknC5C2yRno5hCd e/6tt2mq6ukLz92rfTmdh9z/FT0F/0vU9XWA3ZCKxaaaFbk6siUj5wsDjR/l9kYsk30s /vQ6yWTUkP/M8PlOS5LvKY5w4e8bEOB/hqr1ttcBFn/0QYC1x6R+4Oz9/cpAUwuuux2r 99/L78R2zPRd3+ajxxquLP3FvTZhp+cKHAqqvx1vQpILI2uR+Pd/jBEpzRdHp1lGTez8 SgZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfrZhmr2Oe3Qsoh0dYvKhCzmo9NhUbsQi3vmQRzqGZOXTZEYLH H9A+8f5Y4zu7UcIQDTE+VcQE4LkGhpvCRHKMuh4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyWcjMssjPX/xaNby4xdHcdh0E8aEbUP/deT8WPhXlFx6wMkU1xLliEVv/JqXw4X9jXgKTf/VYpohPX/wbNBog=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7c15:: with SMTP id x21mr139204ljc.55.1561581864272; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:44:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <C31B22F0-1AD6-4CBA-AA75-082F940A81CE@sn3rd.com> <34DC165A-B219-418D-8609-C63424E912C7@sn3rd.com> <F19E8AD4-2E81-45DD-BFA5-2CB9EF23FD04@akamai.com> <CACdeXiJkx1aZCKCsQsHeccjR+UOP-ub452ScE+BNn9+CqpOi-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACdeXiJkx1aZCKCsQsHeccjR+UOP-ub452ScE+BNn9+CqpOi-w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 13:44:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmSCwmZjs+JVyz5GuSfzJE-vrESwuKayGqSkSZ_1C3NYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Harper <nharper=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/e7NDWv5IpqLt5qO_5hXvG_ngutY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] IANA Considerations for draft-ietf-tls-dtls-connection-id
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:44:28 -0000

I think we need to do 3, especially with QUIC. Are we sure they won't
want extensions?

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:55 AM Nick Harper
<nharper=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I have a slight preference for 3.
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 10:35 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
>>
>> Something should be done, I don't have a strong preference for 2 or 3.  Having this info back then might have prevented Heartbleed.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls



-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.