Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 25 March 2015 04:32 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC6C1ACD91 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e94zjQ0cSESK for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85ED1ACD8A for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiag65 with SMTP id g65so12059683oia.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dv9h9YtM683+jfkZESFMApoUkwH+IiPoSu11SJJp9Mk=; b=yZuMapCavp6DlFP+bW5VCSOQVXqR2bXlBrAMlHiEqOqFRitY/pekAsood04tZOvIeh bZF4R68zYVotp4V+iyZ9qgJfcN3ZbvFypQcbNthNG+5eOsz0fhByrXWPpPrVJSYkYYtH BjAJep/NrKVvlXCcCwGG03c4jGd/Ah0z2/oX7TYdSMRjMkSLhHroycOvbtsbydhfDv+H NIwU+DnA1nJID+e1jWBLvUX+YMaHSxKDR15C+FSAoU9mfUwJ/d4VY+fpoXpQiKEO1Ofi 3j6Et8IogJuHjhdbdLgBakT9dpbIXwlzBXWVhGEKnUrKKNsIozTFD5/JAsFs/TYtmhVM lDTg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.64.9 with SMTP id n9mr5634803oia.20.1427257965340; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.151 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEoH-p4F006Uu8Xr=+V08DMAA5_yo2v8_6x-u6Yd+OMmh=_ytg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEoH-p4F006Uu8Xr=+V08DMAA5_yo2v8_6x-u6Yd+OMmh=_ytg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:32:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWAD3LTZDSO_PACfD6m6BXEOvSy4aPgoqk-PbSdqSs3Fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio@coinspect.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eBieI5SlD4Rk8OE_Z4Axk5HeLXw>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:32:47 -0000
Perhaps you can do a better job of explaining precisely what information you want to provide the auditor. It might be that I'm tired, but tlsnotary.org does a terrible job of actually explaining what it is for. On 24 March 2015 at 22:09, Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio@coinspect.com> wrote: > Or in AEAD terminology, every packet payload additional_data would include > the authentication tag of the previous packet. That would be incompatible with DTLS.
- [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary Sergio Demian Lerner
- Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary Mike Hamburg
- Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary Sergio Demian Lerner
- Re: [TLS] Renegotiation and TLSNotary Ilari Liusvaara